LogoLogo
Continuum WebsiteContinuum ApplicationsContinuum KnowledgeAxolotl Platform
Continuum Knowledge
Continuum Knowledge
  • Continuum
  • Data
    • Datasets
      • Pre Training Data
      • Types of Fine Tuning
      • Self Instruct Paper
      • Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslation
      • Systematic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models on Open Datasets
      • Instruction Tuning
      • Instruction Fine Tuning - Alpagasus
      • Less is More For Alignment
      • Enhanced Supervised Fine Tuning
      • Visualising Data using t-SNE
      • UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
      • Training and Evaluation Datasets
      • What is perplexity?
  • MODELS
    • Foundation Models
      • The leaderboard
      • Foundation Models
      • LLama 2 - Analysis
      • Analysis of Llama 3
      • Llama 3.1 series
      • Google Gemini 1.5
      • Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMs
      • Mixtral of Experts
      • Mixture-of-Agents (MoA)
      • Phi 1.5
        • Refining the Art of AI Training: A Deep Dive into Phi 1.5's Innovative Approach
      • Phi 2.0
      • Phi-3 Technical Report
  • Training
    • The Fine Tuning Process
      • Why fine tune?
        • Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?
        • Explanations in Fine Tuning
      • Tokenization
        • Tokenization Is More Than Compression
        • Tokenization - SentencePiece
        • Tokenization explore
        • Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial?
        • Getting the most out of your tokenizer for pre-training and domain adaptation
        • TokenMonster
      • Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning
        • P-Tuning
          • The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
        • Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation
        • Harnessing the Power of PEFT: A Smarter Approach to Fine-tuning Pre-trained Models
        • What is Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) - explained by the inventor
        • Low Rank Adaptation (Lora)
        • Practical Tips for Fine-tuning LMs Using LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
        • Bits and Bytes
        • The Magic behind Qlora
        • Practical Guide to LoRA: Tips and Tricks for Effective Model Adaptation
        • The quantization constant
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized Language Models
        • QLORA and Fine-Tuning of Quantized Language Models (LMs)
        • ReLoRA: High-Rank Training Through Low-Rank Updates
        • SLoRA: Federated Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models
        • GaLora: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projection
      • Hyperparameters
        • Batch Size
        • Padding Tokens
        • Mixed precision training
        • FP8 Formats for Deep Learning
        • Floating Point Numbers
        • Batch Size and Model loss
        • Batch Normalisation
        • Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Language Models
        • Sample Packing
        • Gradient accumulation
        • A process for choosing the learning rate
        • Learning Rate Scheduler
        • Checkpoints
        • A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformers
        • Sequence Length Warmup
        • Understanding Training vs. Evaluation Data Splits
        • Cross-entropy loss
        • Weight Decay
        • Optimiser
        • Caching
      • Training Processes
        • Extending the context window
        • PyTorch Fully Sharded Data Parallel (FSDP)
        • Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolation
        • YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models
        • Sliding Window Attention
        • LongRoPE
        • Reinforcement Learning
        • An introduction to reinforcement learning
        • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
        • Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
  • INFERENCE
    • Why is inference important?
      • Grouped Query Attention
      • Key Value Cache
      • Flash Attention
      • Flash Attention 2
      • StreamingLLM
      • Paged Attention and vLLM
      • TensorRT-LLM
      • Torchscript
      • NVIDIA L40S GPU
      • Triton Inference Server - Introduction
      • Triton Inference Server
      • FiDO: Fusion-in-Decoder optimised for stronger performance and faster inference
      • Is PUE a useful measure of data centre performance?
      • SLORA
  • KNOWLEDGE
    • Vector Databases
      • A Comprehensive Survey on Vector Databases
      • Vector database management systems: Fundamental concepts, use-cases, and current challenges
      • Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Models
      • Decoding Sentence-BERT
      • ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT
      • SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
      • Questions Are All You Need to Train a Dense Passage Retriever
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
      • Massive Text Embedding Benchmark
      • RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-ranking
      • LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders
      • Embedding and Fine-Tuning in Neural Language Models
      • Embedding Model Construction
      • Demystifying Embedding Spaces using Large Language Models
      • Fine-Tuning Llama for Multi-Stage Text Retrieval
      • Large Language Model Based Text Augmentation Enhanced Personality Detection Model
      • One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings
      • Vector Databases are not the only solution
      • Knowledge Graphs
        • Harnessing Knowledge Graphs to Elevate AI: A Technical Exploration
        • Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap
      • Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN)
      • High Dimensional Data
      • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
      • Vector Similarity Search - HNSW
      • FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search)
      • Unsupervised Dense Retrievers
    • Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
      • Fine-Tuning or Retrieval?
      • Revolutionising Information Retrieval: The Power of RAG in Language Models
      • A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation
      • REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training
      • Retrieve Anything To Augment Large Language Models
      • Generate Rather Than Retrieve: Large Language Models Are Strong Context Generators
      • Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • DSPy: LM Assertions: Enhancing Language Model Pipelines with Computational Constraints
      • DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls
      • DSPy: In-Context Learning for Extreme Multi-Label Classification
      • Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs
      • HYDE: Revolutionising Search with Hypothetical Document Embeddings
      • Enhancing Recommender Systems with Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs
      • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) versus fine tuning
      • RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG
      • Summarisation Methods and RAG
      • Lessons Learned on LLM RAG Solutions
      • Stanford: Retrieval Augmented Language Models
      • Overview of RAG Approaches with Vector Databases
      • Mastering Chunking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems
    • Semantic Routing
    • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
  • AGENTS
    • What is agency?
      • Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselves
      • Types of Agents
      • The risk of AI agency
      • Understanding Personality in Large Language Models: A New Frontier in AI Psychology
      • AI Agents - Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling
      • Personality and Brand
      • Agent Interaction via APIs
      • Bridging Minds and Machines: The Legacy of Newell, Shaw, and Simon
      • A Survey on Language Model based Autonomous Agents
      • Large Language Models as Agents
      • AI Reasoning: A Deep Dive into Chain-of-Thought Prompting
      • Enhancing AI Reasoning with Self-Taught Reasoner (STaR)
      • Exploring the Frontier of AI: The "Tree of Thoughts" Framework
      • Toolformer: Revolutionising Language Models with API Integration - An Analysis
      • TaskMatrix.AI: Bridging Foundational AI Models with Specialised Systems for Enhanced Task Completion
      • Unleashing the Power of LLMs in API Integration: The Rise of Gorilla
      • Andrew Ng's presentation on AI agents
      • Making AI accessible with Andrej Karpathy and Stephanie Zhan
  • Regulation and Ethics
    • Regulation and Ethics
      • Privacy
      • Detecting AI Generated content
      • Navigating the IP Maze in AI: The Convergence of Blockchain, Web 3.0, and LLMs
      • Adverse Reactions to generative AI
      • Navigating the Ethical Minefield: The Challenge of Security in Large Language Models
      • Navigating the Uncharted Waters: The Risks of Autonomous AI in Military Decision-Making
  • DISRUPTION
    • Data Architecture
      • What is a data pipeline?
      • What is Reverse ETL?
      • Unstructured Data and Generatve AI
      • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
      • Integrating generative AI with the Semantic Web
    • Search
      • BM25 - Search Engine Ranking Function
      • BERT as a reranking engine
      • BERT and Google
      • Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO)
      • Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs
      • FOLLOWIR: Evaluating and Teaching Information Retrieval Models to Follow Instructions
      • Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Federated Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Latent Space versus Embedding Space
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
    • Recommendation Engines
      • On Interpretation and Measurement of Soft Attributes for Recommendation
      • A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation
      • Model driven recommendation systems
      • Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations
      • Foundation Models for Recommender Systems
      • Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Recommender Systems: An Extensive Review
      • AI driven recommendations - harming autonomy?
    • Logging
      • A Taxonomy of Anomalies in Log Data
      • Deeplog
      • LogBERT: Log Anomaly Detection via BERT
      • Experience Report: Deep Learning-based System Log Analysis for Anomaly Detection
      • Log-based Anomaly Detection with Deep Learning: How Far Are We?
      • Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Log Data: A Survey
      • LogGPT
      • Adaptive Semantic Gate Networks (ASGNet) for log-based anomaly diagnosis
  • Infrastructure
    • The modern data centre
      • Enhancing Data Centre Efficiency: Strategies to Improve PUE
      • TCO of NVIDIA GPUs and falling barriers to entry
      • Maximising GPU Utilisation with Kubernetes and NVIDIA GPU Operator
      • Data Centres
      • Liquid Cooling
    • Servers and Chips
      • The NVIDIA H100 GPU
      • NVIDIA H100 NVL
      • Lambda Hyperplane 8-H100
      • NVIDIA DGX Servers
      • NVIDIA DGX-2
      • NVIDIA DGX H-100 System
      • NVLink Switch
      • Tensor Cores
      • NVIDIA Grace Hopper Superchip
      • NVIDIA Grace CPU Superchip
      • NVIDIA GB200 NVL72
      • Hopper versus Blackwell
      • HGX: High-Performance GPU Platforms
      • ARM Chips
      • ARM versus x86
      • RISC versus CISC
      • Introduction to RISC-V
    • Networking and Connectivity
      • Infiniband versus Ethernet
      • NVIDIA Quantum InfiniBand
      • PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express)
      • NVIDIA ConnectX InfiniBand adapters
      • NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express)
      • NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe-oF)
      • NVIDIA Spectrum-X
      • NVIDIA GPUDirect
      • Evaluating Modern GPU Interconnect
      • Scalable Hierarchical Aggregation and Reduction Protocol (SHARP)
      • Next-generation networking in AI environments
      • NVIDIA Collective Communications Library (NCCL)
    • Data and Memory
      • NVIDIA BlueField Data Processing Units (DPUs)
      • Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)
      • High Bandwidth Memory (HBM3)
      • Flash Memory
      • Model Requirements
      • Calculating GPU memory for serving LLMs
      • Transformer training costs
      • GPU Performance Optimisation
    • Libraries and Complements
      • NVIDIA Base Command
      • NVIDIA AI Enterprise
      • CUDA - NVIDIA GTC 2024 presentation
      • RAPIDs
      • RAFT
    • Vast Data Platform
      • Vast Datastore
      • Vast Database
      • Vast Data Engine
      • DASE (Disaggregated and Shared Everything)
      • Dremio and VAST Data
    • Storage
      • WEKA: A High-Performance Storage Solution for AI Workloads
      • Introduction to NVIDIA GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
        • GDS cuFile API
      • NVIDIA Magnum IO GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
      • Vectors in Memory
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Continuum - Accelerated Artificial Intelligence

  • Continuum Website
  • Axolotl Platform

Copyright Continuum Labs - 2023

On this page
  • Memory challenges in LLM training
  • Other Methodologies
  • Gradient Low-Rank Projection (GaLore)
  • GaLore's memory-efficient training techniques
  • Conclusion

Was this helpful?

  1. Training
  2. The Fine Tuning Process
  3. Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning

GaLora: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projection

PreviousSLoRA: Federated Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language ModelsNextHyperparameters

Last updated 11 months ago

Was this helpful?

This March 2024 paper addresses the memory challenges in training large language models (LLMs) and proposes a novel approach called Gradient Low-Rank Projection (GaLore) to reduce memory usage while maintaining performance.

Memory challenges in LLM training

  • The growing size of weights and optimizer states in LLMs leads to significant memory requirements.

  • Pre-training a LLaMA 7B model from scratch with a single batch size requires at least 58 GB of memory, making it infeasible on consumer-level GPUs like NVIDIA RTX 4090 with 24 GB memory.

Limitations of existing memory-reduction approaches

  • Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) reduces trainable parameters and optimizer states by adding a trainable low-rank matrix to the frozen pre-trained weight in each layer.

  • LoRA and its variant ReLoRA have limitations, such as underperforming full-rank training, requiring full-rank warm-up, and altering training dynamics.

Gradient Low-Rank Projection (GaLore):

  • GaLore is a training strategy that allows full-parameter learning while being more memory-efficient than common low-rank adaptation methods.

  • The key idea is to leverage the slow-changing low-rank structure of the gradient matrix G, rather than approximating the weight matrix itself as low-rank.

  • GaLore computes two projection matrices P and Q to project the gradient matrix G into a low-rank form P⊤GQ, reducing the memory cost of optimizer states.

  • Occasional updates of P and Q (e.g., every 200 iterations) incur minimal amortized additional computational cost.

Memory efficiency of GaLore

  • GaLore is more memory-efficient than LoRA, yielding up to 30% memory reduction during pre-training.

  • 8-bit GaLore, combined with 8-bit optimizers and layer-wise weight update techniques, achieves comparable performance to its full-rank counterpart with less than 10% memory cost of optimizer states.

Feasibility of pre-training on consumer GPUs

  • GaLore enables, for the first time, the feasibility of pre-training a LLaMA 7B model from scratch on a single GPU with 24 GB memory (e.g., NVIDIA RTX 4090) without costly memory offloading techniques.

  • GaLore keeps low memory throughout the entire training, without requiring full-rank training warm-up like ReLoRA.

Performance in fine-tuning

  • GaLore is used to fine-tune pre-trained LLMs on GLUE benchmarks with comparable or better results than existing low-rank methods.

  • When fine-tuning RoBERTa-Base on GLUE tasks with a rank of 4, GaLore outperforms LoRA.

Compatibility and ease of use

  • As a gradient projection method, GaLore is independent of the choice of optimizers and can be easily plugged into existing ones with only two lines of code.

  • GaLore works for popular optimizers such as AdamW, 8-bit Adam, and Adafactor, and its performance is insensitive to the very few hyperparameters it introduces.

Theoretical justification and convergence analysis

  • The paper provides theoretical justification for the low-rankness of gradient updates and convergence analysis of GaLore.

Other Methodologies

The paper discusses several methodologies for memory-efficient optimization in training large language models (LLMs). Here's a simplified comparison and contrast of the key approaches:

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)

  • LoRA reduces memory footprint by maintaining a low-rank weight adaptor for each layer.

  • It introduces additional low-rank adaptors (A and B) to the fixed weight matrix (W0).

  • LoRA and its variants have limitations, such as underperforming full-rank training and requiring full-rank warm-up.

Subspace Learning

  • Subspace learning optimizes model weights within a low-rank subspace.

  • It leverages the finding that learning primarily occurs within a significantly low-dimensional parameter subspace.

  • This notion has been widely used in various domains of machine learning.

Projected Gradient Descent (PGD)

  • PGD is a traditional optimization method that studies gradients in the vector space.

  • GaLore is related to PGD but considers the specific gradient form that appears in training multi-layer neural networks.

  • GaLore proves properties of the gradients in the matrix space, while traditional PGD treats the objective as a general black-box nonlinear function.

Memory-Efficient Optimisation

  • Various methods have been proposed to reduce the memory cost of gradient statistics for adaptive optimization algorithms.

  • Adafactor achieves sub-linear memory cost by factorizing the second-order statistics using a row-column outer product.

  • Quantization is widely used to reduce the memory cost of optimizer states.

  • Fused gradient computation reduces the memory cost of storing weight gradients during training.

Gradient Low-Rank Projection (GaLore)

  • GaLore is a training strategy that allows full-parameter learning while being more memory-efficient than low-rank adaptation methods.

  • It leverages the slow-changing low-rank structure of the gradient matrix G.

  • GaLore computes projection matrices P and Q to project the gradient matrix G into a low-rank form, reducing the memory cost of optimizer states.

  • Unlike LoRA, GaLore explicitly utilizes low-rank updates instead of introducing additional low-rank adaptors, preserving the original training dynamics.

  • GaLore operates independently of the optimizers, as they directly receive the low-rank gradients without knowing their full-rank counterparts.

In summary, LoRA and subspace learning focus on optimizing model weights within a low-rank subspace, while GaLore leverages the low-rank structure of the gradient matrix to reduce memory cost. PGD is a traditional optimization method, and memory-efficient optimization techniques like Adafactor and quantization aim to reduce the memory cost of optimizer states. GaLore differs from LoRA by explicitly utilizing low-rank updates and preserving the original training dynamics, making it more memory-efficient while maintaining performance.

GaLore's memory-efficient training techniques

Composition of Low-Rank Subspaces

  • GaLore allows switching across low-rank subspaces during training to learn full-rank weights without increasing memory footprint.

  • The weight updates are accumulated within each subspace, and the projectors (P and Q) are re-initialized when switching to a new subspace.

  • The switching frequency (T) becomes a hyperparameter, with a sweet spot existing between too frequent and too infrequent changes.

  • The computational overhead induced by SVD for subspace switching is negligible compared to other memory-efficient training techniques.

Memory-Efficient Optimization

  • GaLore significantly reduces the memory cost of optimizers that rely on component-wise gradient statistics, such as Adam.

  • By projecting the gradient G into its low-rank form R, Adam's gradient regularizer only needs to track low-rank gradient statistics.

  • GaLore can be applied to other optimizers (e.g., Adafactor) with similar update rules and memory requirements for gradient statistics.

  • To achieve the best memory-performance trade-off, GaLore uses only one projection matrix (P or Q) based on the dimensions of the weight matrix.

  • GaLore requires less memory than LoRA during training, as it does not need to store a separate low-rank factorization.

Combining with Existing Techniques

  • GaLore is compatible with existing memory-efficient optimization techniques, such as 8-bit optimizers and per-layer weight updates.

  • 8-bit Adam optimizer maintains 32-bit optimizer performance at a fraction of the original memory footprint, and GaLore can be directly applied to its implementation.

  • Per-layer weight updates are adopted in GaLore to further reduce memory footprint by performing weight updates during backpropagation.

Hyperparameters of GaLore

  • GaLore introduces very few additional hyperparameters: rank (r), subspace change frequency (T), and scale factor (α).

  • The rank (r) is also present in LoRA, while the subspace change frequency (T) is specific to GaLore.

  • The scale factor (α) controls the strength of the low-rank update and does not depend on the rank (r), unlike LoRA's scale factor (α/r).

GaLore's memory-efficient training techniques, such as low-rank subspace composition and memory-efficient optimisation, enable it to learn full-rank weights while significantly reducing memory footprint.

GaLore is compatible with existing optimisation methods, such as 8-bit Adam and per-layer weight updates, further enhancing its memory efficiency. The introduction of very few additional hyperparameters makes GaLore easy to use and tune for optimal performance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper introduces GaLore, a novel memory-efficient approach for pre-training and fine-tuning large language models.

GaLore employs gradient low-rank projection to significantly reduce the memory footprint required for storing model parameters and optimizer states, achieving up to 65.5% memory savings compared to traditional methods.

Extensive experiments on pre-training LLaMA models up to 7 billion parameters and fine-tuning on the GLUE benchmark demonstrate that GaLore maintains comparable performance to full-rank training while utilizing substantially less memory.

Notably, GaLore enables pre-training 7B models within the memory constraints of consumer GPUs like the RTX 4090, facilitating more accessible large model training.

The success of GaLore highlights the potential of gradient low-rank projection techniques for memory-efficient training of large models.

Looking ahead, future research can explore applying GaLore to other model architectures, further improving memory efficiency through quantization or specialized projection matrices, and enabling elastic distributed training on consumer hardware.

Ultimately, GaLore represents a promising step towards democratising the training of large language models by reducing the substantial computational resources traditionally required. By making large model training more accessible, GaLore could foster broader innovation and applications in natural language processing and beyond.

LogoGaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank ProjectionarXiv.org
GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projection
Page cover image