LogoLogo
Continuum WebsiteContinuum ApplicationsContinuum KnowledgeAxolotl Platform
Continuum Knowledge
Continuum Knowledge
  • Continuum
  • Data
    • Datasets
      • Pre Training Data
      • Types of Fine Tuning
      • Self Instruct Paper
      • Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslation
      • Systematic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models on Open Datasets
      • Instruction Tuning
      • Instruction Fine Tuning - Alpagasus
      • Less is More For Alignment
      • Enhanced Supervised Fine Tuning
      • Visualising Data using t-SNE
      • UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
      • Training and Evaluation Datasets
      • What is perplexity?
  • MODELS
    • Foundation Models
      • The leaderboard
      • Foundation Models
      • LLama 2 - Analysis
      • Analysis of Llama 3
      • Llama 3.1 series
      • Google Gemini 1.5
      • Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMs
      • Mixtral of Experts
      • Mixture-of-Agents (MoA)
      • Phi 1.5
        • Refining the Art of AI Training: A Deep Dive into Phi 1.5's Innovative Approach
      • Phi 2.0
      • Phi-3 Technical Report
  • Training
    • The Fine Tuning Process
      • Why fine tune?
        • Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?
        • Explanations in Fine Tuning
      • Tokenization
        • Tokenization Is More Than Compression
        • Tokenization - SentencePiece
        • Tokenization explore
        • Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial?
        • Getting the most out of your tokenizer for pre-training and domain adaptation
        • TokenMonster
      • Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning
        • P-Tuning
          • The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
        • Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation
        • Harnessing the Power of PEFT: A Smarter Approach to Fine-tuning Pre-trained Models
        • What is Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) - explained by the inventor
        • Low Rank Adaptation (Lora)
        • Practical Tips for Fine-tuning LMs Using LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
        • Bits and Bytes
        • The Magic behind Qlora
        • Practical Guide to LoRA: Tips and Tricks for Effective Model Adaptation
        • The quantization constant
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized Language Models
        • QLORA and Fine-Tuning of Quantized Language Models (LMs)
        • ReLoRA: High-Rank Training Through Low-Rank Updates
        • SLoRA: Federated Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models
        • GaLora: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projection
      • Hyperparameters
        • Batch Size
        • Padding Tokens
        • Mixed precision training
        • FP8 Formats for Deep Learning
        • Floating Point Numbers
        • Batch Size and Model loss
        • Batch Normalisation
        • Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Language Models
        • Sample Packing
        • Gradient accumulation
        • A process for choosing the learning rate
        • Learning Rate Scheduler
        • Checkpoints
        • A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformers
        • Sequence Length Warmup
        • Understanding Training vs. Evaluation Data Splits
        • Cross-entropy loss
        • Weight Decay
        • Optimiser
        • Caching
      • Training Processes
        • Extending the context window
        • PyTorch Fully Sharded Data Parallel (FSDP)
        • Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolation
        • YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models
        • Sliding Window Attention
        • LongRoPE
        • Reinforcement Learning
        • An introduction to reinforcement learning
        • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
        • Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
  • INFERENCE
    • Why is inference important?
      • Grouped Query Attention
      • Key Value Cache
      • Flash Attention
      • Flash Attention 2
      • StreamingLLM
      • Paged Attention and vLLM
      • TensorRT-LLM
      • Torchscript
      • NVIDIA L40S GPU
      • Triton Inference Server - Introduction
      • Triton Inference Server
      • FiDO: Fusion-in-Decoder optimised for stronger performance and faster inference
      • Is PUE a useful measure of data centre performance?
      • SLORA
  • KNOWLEDGE
    • Vector Databases
      • A Comprehensive Survey on Vector Databases
      • Vector database management systems: Fundamental concepts, use-cases, and current challenges
      • Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Models
      • Decoding Sentence-BERT
      • ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT
      • SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
      • Questions Are All You Need to Train a Dense Passage Retriever
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
      • Massive Text Embedding Benchmark
      • RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-ranking
      • LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders
      • Embedding and Fine-Tuning in Neural Language Models
      • Embedding Model Construction
      • Demystifying Embedding Spaces using Large Language Models
      • Fine-Tuning Llama for Multi-Stage Text Retrieval
      • Large Language Model Based Text Augmentation Enhanced Personality Detection Model
      • One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings
      • Vector Databases are not the only solution
      • Knowledge Graphs
        • Harnessing Knowledge Graphs to Elevate AI: A Technical Exploration
        • Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap
      • Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN)
      • High Dimensional Data
      • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
      • Vector Similarity Search - HNSW
      • FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search)
      • Unsupervised Dense Retrievers
    • Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
      • Fine-Tuning or Retrieval?
      • Revolutionising Information Retrieval: The Power of RAG in Language Models
      • A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation
      • REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training
      • Retrieve Anything To Augment Large Language Models
      • Generate Rather Than Retrieve: Large Language Models Are Strong Context Generators
      • Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • DSPy: LM Assertions: Enhancing Language Model Pipelines with Computational Constraints
      • DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls
      • DSPy: In-Context Learning for Extreme Multi-Label Classification
      • Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs
      • HYDE: Revolutionising Search with Hypothetical Document Embeddings
      • Enhancing Recommender Systems with Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs
      • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) versus fine tuning
      • RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG
      • Summarisation Methods and RAG
      • Lessons Learned on LLM RAG Solutions
      • Stanford: Retrieval Augmented Language Models
      • Overview of RAG Approaches with Vector Databases
      • Mastering Chunking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems
    • Semantic Routing
    • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
  • AGENTS
    • What is agency?
      • Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselves
      • Types of Agents
      • The risk of AI agency
      • Understanding Personality in Large Language Models: A New Frontier in AI Psychology
      • AI Agents - Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling
      • Personality and Brand
      • Agent Interaction via APIs
      • Bridging Minds and Machines: The Legacy of Newell, Shaw, and Simon
      • A Survey on Language Model based Autonomous Agents
      • Large Language Models as Agents
      • AI Reasoning: A Deep Dive into Chain-of-Thought Prompting
      • Enhancing AI Reasoning with Self-Taught Reasoner (STaR)
      • Exploring the Frontier of AI: The "Tree of Thoughts" Framework
      • Toolformer: Revolutionising Language Models with API Integration - An Analysis
      • TaskMatrix.AI: Bridging Foundational AI Models with Specialised Systems for Enhanced Task Completion
      • Unleashing the Power of LLMs in API Integration: The Rise of Gorilla
      • Andrew Ng's presentation on AI agents
      • Making AI accessible with Andrej Karpathy and Stephanie Zhan
  • Regulation and Ethics
    • Regulation and Ethics
      • Privacy
      • Detecting AI Generated content
      • Navigating the IP Maze in AI: The Convergence of Blockchain, Web 3.0, and LLMs
      • Adverse Reactions to generative AI
      • Navigating the Ethical Minefield: The Challenge of Security in Large Language Models
      • Navigating the Uncharted Waters: The Risks of Autonomous AI in Military Decision-Making
  • DISRUPTION
    • Data Architecture
      • What is a data pipeline?
      • What is Reverse ETL?
      • Unstructured Data and Generatve AI
      • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
      • Integrating generative AI with the Semantic Web
    • Search
      • BM25 - Search Engine Ranking Function
      • BERT as a reranking engine
      • BERT and Google
      • Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO)
      • Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs
      • FOLLOWIR: Evaluating and Teaching Information Retrieval Models to Follow Instructions
      • Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Federated Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Latent Space versus Embedding Space
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
    • Recommendation Engines
      • On Interpretation and Measurement of Soft Attributes for Recommendation
      • A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation
      • Model driven recommendation systems
      • Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations
      • Foundation Models for Recommender Systems
      • Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Recommender Systems: An Extensive Review
      • AI driven recommendations - harming autonomy?
    • Logging
      • A Taxonomy of Anomalies in Log Data
      • Deeplog
      • LogBERT: Log Anomaly Detection via BERT
      • Experience Report: Deep Learning-based System Log Analysis for Anomaly Detection
      • Log-based Anomaly Detection with Deep Learning: How Far Are We?
      • Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Log Data: A Survey
      • LogGPT
      • Adaptive Semantic Gate Networks (ASGNet) for log-based anomaly diagnosis
  • Infrastructure
    • The modern data centre
      • Enhancing Data Centre Efficiency: Strategies to Improve PUE
      • TCO of NVIDIA GPUs and falling barriers to entry
      • Maximising GPU Utilisation with Kubernetes and NVIDIA GPU Operator
      • Data Centres
      • Liquid Cooling
    • Servers and Chips
      • The NVIDIA H100 GPU
      • NVIDIA H100 NVL
      • Lambda Hyperplane 8-H100
      • NVIDIA DGX Servers
      • NVIDIA DGX-2
      • NVIDIA DGX H-100 System
      • NVLink Switch
      • Tensor Cores
      • NVIDIA Grace Hopper Superchip
      • NVIDIA Grace CPU Superchip
      • NVIDIA GB200 NVL72
      • Hopper versus Blackwell
      • HGX: High-Performance GPU Platforms
      • ARM Chips
      • ARM versus x86
      • RISC versus CISC
      • Introduction to RISC-V
    • Networking and Connectivity
      • Infiniband versus Ethernet
      • NVIDIA Quantum InfiniBand
      • PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express)
      • NVIDIA ConnectX InfiniBand adapters
      • NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express)
      • NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe-oF)
      • NVIDIA Spectrum-X
      • NVIDIA GPUDirect
      • Evaluating Modern GPU Interconnect
      • Scalable Hierarchical Aggregation and Reduction Protocol (SHARP)
      • Next-generation networking in AI environments
      • NVIDIA Collective Communications Library (NCCL)
    • Data and Memory
      • NVIDIA BlueField Data Processing Units (DPUs)
      • Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)
      • High Bandwidth Memory (HBM3)
      • Flash Memory
      • Model Requirements
      • Calculating GPU memory for serving LLMs
      • Transformer training costs
      • GPU Performance Optimisation
    • Libraries and Complements
      • NVIDIA Base Command
      • NVIDIA AI Enterprise
      • CUDA - NVIDIA GTC 2024 presentation
      • RAPIDs
      • RAFT
    • Vast Data Platform
      • Vast Datastore
      • Vast Database
      • Vast Data Engine
      • DASE (Disaggregated and Shared Everything)
      • Dremio and VAST Data
    • Storage
      • WEKA: A High-Performance Storage Solution for AI Workloads
      • Introduction to NVIDIA GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
        • GDS cuFile API
      • NVIDIA Magnum IO GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
      • Vectors in Memory
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Continuum - Accelerated Artificial Intelligence

  • Continuum Website
  • Axolotl Platform

Copyright Continuum Labs - 2023

On this page
  • Hyperparameters Used
  • Training Data
  • Findings
  • Conclusion

Was this helpful?

  1. Data
  2. Datasets

Less is More For Alignment

Co-authored by researchers from Meta, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Southern California, and Tel Aviv University

PreviousInstruction Fine Tuning - AlpagasusNextEnhanced Supervised Fine Tuning

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

This May 2023 paper made waves in the AI community by challenging the prevailing notion that extensive fine-tuning is necessary for refining large language models (LLMs) and proposes a more efficient approach that leverages smaller, high-quality datasets.

The paper introduces LIMA, a 65-billion parameter LLaMa language model, which diverges from conventional training approaches by being fine-tuned with a standard supervised loss on only 1,000 carefully curated prompts and responses.

Remarkably, LIMA demonstrates strong performance, learning to follow specific response formats from a minimal number of examples and generalising well to unseen tasks, ranging from planning trip itineraries to speculating about alternate histories.

In a controlled human study, LIMA's responses were either equivalent to or strictly preferred over those from GPT-4 in 43% of cases, a statistic that rises to 58% when compared against Bard and 65% versus DaVinci 003, models trained with extensive reinforcement learning and human feedback.

These findings suggest that the bulk of knowledge in large language models is acquired during the pre training phase, and that only a limited amount of instruction tuning data is necessary for models to produce high-quality output. This challenges the prevailing notion that significant compute and specialised data are essential for achieving high performance, opening new avenues for efficient and effective language model training.

The Superficial Alignment Hypothesis

At the core of the paper is the "Superficial Alignment Hypothesis," which suggests that the majority of a language model's capabilities are acquired during the pretraining phase.

According to this hypothesis, the primary role of alignment is to teach the model the appropriate format for user interaction. This idea shifts the focus from extensive fine-tuning to a more targeted approach that emphasizes dataset quality over quantity.

Hyperparameters Used

The training of LIMA incorporated a mix of standard and innovative hyperparameters, with specific attention to preventing overfitting and ensuring the model's ability to distinguish between different speakers. The manual selection of checkpoints highlights a focus on qualitative evaluation, which is especially important for models aimed at generating high-quality, contextually appropriate responses.

Use of Special Token

A unique end-of-turn (EOT) token was introduced to differentiate between user and assistant utterances. This choice avoids confusion with the existing end-of-sentence (EOS) token, which the pretrained model might associate with different meanings.

Standard Fine-tuning Parameters

The model was fine-tuned for 15 epochs using the AdamW optimizer. This optimizer is known for its effectiveness in large model training due to its handling of weight decay. The specific values for the AdamW hyperparameters were β1 = 0.9 and β2 = 0.95, with a weight decay of 0.1.

Learning Rate Strategy

The initial learning rate was set at 1e-5, with a linear decay to 1e-6 by the end of training. This gradual reduction is a common approach to stabilize and refine the learning process over time.

Batch Size and Token Limit

The batch size was set to 32 examples (or 64 for smaller models). Texts longer than 2048 tokens were trimmed, ensuring manageable training sizes and focusing the model's attention on the most relevant parts of the data.

Residual Dropout

A notable deviation from standard practice was the use of residual dropout. The dropout rate started at 0% at the bottom layer and increased linearly to 30% at the last layer (20% for smaller models). This approach, inspired by Ouyang et al. [2022], suggests a focus on preventing overfitting in deeper layers of the model.

Manual Selection of Checkpoints

Interestingly, the team did not rely on perplexity as an indicator of generation quality. Instead, they manually selected checkpoints between the 5th and the 10th epochs using a held-out 50-example development set. This indicates a more hands-on approach to model tuning, prioritizing qualitative assessments over traditional metrics.

Training Data

The study demonstrated that LIMA, despite being trained on a limited yet diverse and high-quality dataset, was capable of robust performance, even outperforming models trained on much larger datasets in some cases.

This underscores the importance of pretraining and the potential efficiency gains from fine-tuning with carefully selected data.

Source and Composition

The training data comprised 1,000 examples that mimic real user prompts and high-quality responses. This set includes 750 top questions and answers from community forums like Stack Exchange (in both STEM and other categories) and wikiHow. These were selected for their quality and diversity. The average input and output lengths varied across sources, indicating a mix of brief and detailed interactions.

Manual Contributions

Additionally, the paper authors manually wrote 250 examples to optimise for task diversity and uniform response style. This was done to align with the spirit of an AI assistant, ensuring that the model could adapt to a variety of tasks while maintaining a consistent approach in its responses.

Diverse Data Sources

The training data encompassed a wide range of sources, including technical forums (Stack Exchange), practical guides (wikiHow), creative writing prompts (Pushshift r/WritingPrompts), and instructional examples (Natural Instructions). This diversity was aimed at exposing the model to a broad spectrum of query types and response styles.

Controlled Data Size

The total amount of training data was about 750,000 tokens, split over exactly 1,000 sequences. This small dataset size, especially compared to the extensive datasets typically used for language model training, was a deliberate choice to test the efficacy of fine-tuning on a highly curated dataset.

Emphasis on Quality and Style

The focus was on the quality and style of the data rather than its quantity. The training set aimed to teach LIMA how to interact with users effectively by following a specific format, rather than inundating it with an extensive amount of varied data.

The training set used in the study for LIMA, a 65B-parameter LLaMa model, was curated to test the hypothesis that alignment can be simplified by teaching the model to interact with users in a specific style, leveraging the knowledge and capabilities acquired during pretraining. Here's a detailed explanation of the training set:

Findings

Dataset Quality Over Quantity: The study prioritises the quality of the dataset for fine-tuning, utilizing only 1,000 high-quality examples to achieve significant performance improvements.

Dataset Composition and Size: Emphasizes the creation of a small yet diverse training dataset, including sources like Stack Exchange and WikiHow, to promote task diversity and a uniform response style.

Diversity and Labourious Dataset Creation: Highlights the intensive effort required to create a diverse and high-quality dataset, underlining the importance of manual curation.

Dataset Creation Challenges: Explores the challenges in effectively creating and refining datasets for fine-tuning, focusing on the balance between size and quality.

Comparative Analysis with Other Models: LIMA is benchmarked against state-of-the-art models, showing comparable or superior performance in some instances.

Performance on Out-of-Distribution Samples: LIMA demonstrates strong generalisation on novel tasks but shows a tendency for unsafe responses, highlighting the importance of diverse input for quality output.

Single vs. Multi-Turn Dialogue Testing: Showcases LIMA's adaptability in various conversational contexts, from single-turn responses to coherent multi-turn dialogues.

Annotation and Labeling Considerations: Discusses the evolving role of annotation and labeling, particularly in ensuring data quality and consistency.

Factors Influencing Input Diversity: Considers multiple factors that contribute to dataset diversity, such as formatting, concepts, and sentiment.

Measuring Input Diversity and Output Quality: Raises the challenge of quantitatively assessing critical factors like input diversity and output quality in datasets.

Application-Specific Fine-Tuning: Considers the benefits of fine-tuning models for specific applications, suggesting a tailored approach based on domain requirements.

Alignment Data and Superficial Alignment Hypothesis: Tests the hypothesis that alignment mainly involves teaching the model user interaction styles, leveraging pretraining knowledge.

Prompt Creation Process: Highlights the meticulous process of creating prompts and responses to ensure uniformity and relevance.

Interactivity and Intelligence: Suggests that model intelligence appears to enhance with longer user interactions and self-referencing.

Conclusion

"Less is More For Alignment" presents a compelling case for efficient fine-tuning of LLMs using smaller, high-quality datasets.

The paper challenges conventional wisdom and opens up new avenues for exploration in the field. As the landscape of LLMs continues to evolve rapidly, this research contributes to the ongoing discourse on model refinement and alignment.

The paper highlights the importance of dataset quality, diversity, and the need for comprehensive evaluation metrics. It also underscores the potential for leveraging LLMs themselves in model assessment and the evolving role of annotation and labeling in dataset curation.

As the AI community continues to push the boundaries of what's possible with LLMs, papers like "Less is More For Alignment" inspire researchers and practitioners to rethink assumptions and explore innovative approaches. The insights gained from this research will undoubtedly shape the future of language model fine-tuning and contribute to the advancement of this transformative technology.

LogoLIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentarXiv.org
"Less is More For Alignment": Challenging Conventions in Language Model Fine-Tuning
Page cover image