LogoLogo
Continuum WebsiteContinuum ApplicationsContinuum KnowledgeAxolotl Platform
Continuum Knowledge
Continuum Knowledge
  • Continuum
  • Data
    • Datasets
      • Pre Training Data
      • Types of Fine Tuning
      • Self Instruct Paper
      • Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslation
      • Systematic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models on Open Datasets
      • Instruction Tuning
      • Instruction Fine Tuning - Alpagasus
      • Less is More For Alignment
      • Enhanced Supervised Fine Tuning
      • Visualising Data using t-SNE
      • UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
      • Training and Evaluation Datasets
      • What is perplexity?
  • MODELS
    • Foundation Models
      • The leaderboard
      • Foundation Models
      • LLama 2 - Analysis
      • Analysis of Llama 3
      • Llama 3.1 series
      • Google Gemini 1.5
      • Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMs
      • Mixtral of Experts
      • Mixture-of-Agents (MoA)
      • Phi 1.5
        • Refining the Art of AI Training: A Deep Dive into Phi 1.5's Innovative Approach
      • Phi 2.0
      • Phi-3 Technical Report
  • Training
    • The Fine Tuning Process
      • Why fine tune?
        • Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?
        • Explanations in Fine Tuning
      • Tokenization
        • Tokenization Is More Than Compression
        • Tokenization - SentencePiece
        • Tokenization explore
        • Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial?
        • Getting the most out of your tokenizer for pre-training and domain adaptation
        • TokenMonster
      • Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning
        • P-Tuning
          • The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
        • Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation
        • Harnessing the Power of PEFT: A Smarter Approach to Fine-tuning Pre-trained Models
        • What is Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) - explained by the inventor
        • Low Rank Adaptation (Lora)
        • Practical Tips for Fine-tuning LMs Using LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
        • Bits and Bytes
        • The Magic behind Qlora
        • Practical Guide to LoRA: Tips and Tricks for Effective Model Adaptation
        • The quantization constant
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized Language Models
        • QLORA and Fine-Tuning of Quantized Language Models (LMs)
        • ReLoRA: High-Rank Training Through Low-Rank Updates
        • SLoRA: Federated Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models
        • GaLora: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projection
      • Hyperparameters
        • Batch Size
        • Padding Tokens
        • Mixed precision training
        • FP8 Formats for Deep Learning
        • Floating Point Numbers
        • Batch Size and Model loss
        • Batch Normalisation
        • Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Language Models
        • Sample Packing
        • Gradient accumulation
        • A process for choosing the learning rate
        • Learning Rate Scheduler
        • Checkpoints
        • A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformers
        • Sequence Length Warmup
        • Understanding Training vs. Evaluation Data Splits
        • Cross-entropy loss
        • Weight Decay
        • Optimiser
        • Caching
      • Training Processes
        • Extending the context window
        • PyTorch Fully Sharded Data Parallel (FSDP)
        • Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolation
        • YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models
        • Sliding Window Attention
        • LongRoPE
        • Reinforcement Learning
        • An introduction to reinforcement learning
        • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
        • Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
  • INFERENCE
    • Why is inference important?
      • Grouped Query Attention
      • Key Value Cache
      • Flash Attention
      • Flash Attention 2
      • StreamingLLM
      • Paged Attention and vLLM
      • TensorRT-LLM
      • Torchscript
      • NVIDIA L40S GPU
      • Triton Inference Server - Introduction
      • Triton Inference Server
      • FiDO: Fusion-in-Decoder optimised for stronger performance and faster inference
      • Is PUE a useful measure of data centre performance?
      • SLORA
  • KNOWLEDGE
    • Vector Databases
      • A Comprehensive Survey on Vector Databases
      • Vector database management systems: Fundamental concepts, use-cases, and current challenges
      • Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Models
      • Decoding Sentence-BERT
      • ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT
      • SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
      • Questions Are All You Need to Train a Dense Passage Retriever
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
      • Massive Text Embedding Benchmark
      • RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-ranking
      • LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders
      • Embedding and Fine-Tuning in Neural Language Models
      • Embedding Model Construction
      • Demystifying Embedding Spaces using Large Language Models
      • Fine-Tuning Llama for Multi-Stage Text Retrieval
      • Large Language Model Based Text Augmentation Enhanced Personality Detection Model
      • One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings
      • Vector Databases are not the only solution
      • Knowledge Graphs
        • Harnessing Knowledge Graphs to Elevate AI: A Technical Exploration
        • Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap
      • Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN)
      • High Dimensional Data
      • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
      • Vector Similarity Search - HNSW
      • FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search)
      • Unsupervised Dense Retrievers
    • Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
      • Fine-Tuning or Retrieval?
      • Revolutionising Information Retrieval: The Power of RAG in Language Models
      • A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation
      • REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training
      • Retrieve Anything To Augment Large Language Models
      • Generate Rather Than Retrieve: Large Language Models Are Strong Context Generators
      • Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • DSPy: LM Assertions: Enhancing Language Model Pipelines with Computational Constraints
      • DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls
      • DSPy: In-Context Learning for Extreme Multi-Label Classification
      • Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs
      • HYDE: Revolutionising Search with Hypothetical Document Embeddings
      • Enhancing Recommender Systems with Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs
      • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) versus fine tuning
      • RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG
      • Summarisation Methods and RAG
      • Lessons Learned on LLM RAG Solutions
      • Stanford: Retrieval Augmented Language Models
      • Overview of RAG Approaches with Vector Databases
      • Mastering Chunking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems
    • Semantic Routing
    • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
  • AGENTS
    • What is agency?
      • Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselves
      • Types of Agents
      • The risk of AI agency
      • Understanding Personality in Large Language Models: A New Frontier in AI Psychology
      • AI Agents - Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling
      • Personality and Brand
      • Agent Interaction via APIs
      • Bridging Minds and Machines: The Legacy of Newell, Shaw, and Simon
      • A Survey on Language Model based Autonomous Agents
      • Large Language Models as Agents
      • AI Reasoning: A Deep Dive into Chain-of-Thought Prompting
      • Enhancing AI Reasoning with Self-Taught Reasoner (STaR)
      • Exploring the Frontier of AI: The "Tree of Thoughts" Framework
      • Toolformer: Revolutionising Language Models with API Integration - An Analysis
      • TaskMatrix.AI: Bridging Foundational AI Models with Specialised Systems for Enhanced Task Completion
      • Unleashing the Power of LLMs in API Integration: The Rise of Gorilla
      • Andrew Ng's presentation on AI agents
      • Making AI accessible with Andrej Karpathy and Stephanie Zhan
  • Regulation and Ethics
    • Regulation and Ethics
      • Privacy
      • Detecting AI Generated content
      • Navigating the IP Maze in AI: The Convergence of Blockchain, Web 3.0, and LLMs
      • Adverse Reactions to generative AI
      • Navigating the Ethical Minefield: The Challenge of Security in Large Language Models
      • Navigating the Uncharted Waters: The Risks of Autonomous AI in Military Decision-Making
  • DISRUPTION
    • Data Architecture
      • What is a data pipeline?
      • What is Reverse ETL?
      • Unstructured Data and Generatve AI
      • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
      • Integrating generative AI with the Semantic Web
    • Search
      • BM25 - Search Engine Ranking Function
      • BERT as a reranking engine
      • BERT and Google
      • Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO)
      • Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs
      • FOLLOWIR: Evaluating and Teaching Information Retrieval Models to Follow Instructions
      • Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Federated Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Latent Space versus Embedding Space
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
    • Recommendation Engines
      • On Interpretation and Measurement of Soft Attributes for Recommendation
      • A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation
      • Model driven recommendation systems
      • Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations
      • Foundation Models for Recommender Systems
      • Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Recommender Systems: An Extensive Review
      • AI driven recommendations - harming autonomy?
    • Logging
      • A Taxonomy of Anomalies in Log Data
      • Deeplog
      • LogBERT: Log Anomaly Detection via BERT
      • Experience Report: Deep Learning-based System Log Analysis for Anomaly Detection
      • Log-based Anomaly Detection with Deep Learning: How Far Are We?
      • Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Log Data: A Survey
      • LogGPT
      • Adaptive Semantic Gate Networks (ASGNet) for log-based anomaly diagnosis
  • Infrastructure
    • The modern data centre
      • Enhancing Data Centre Efficiency: Strategies to Improve PUE
      • TCO of NVIDIA GPUs and falling barriers to entry
      • Maximising GPU Utilisation with Kubernetes and NVIDIA GPU Operator
      • Data Centres
      • Liquid Cooling
    • Servers and Chips
      • The NVIDIA H100 GPU
      • NVIDIA H100 NVL
      • Lambda Hyperplane 8-H100
      • NVIDIA DGX Servers
      • NVIDIA DGX-2
      • NVIDIA DGX H-100 System
      • NVLink Switch
      • Tensor Cores
      • NVIDIA Grace Hopper Superchip
      • NVIDIA Grace CPU Superchip
      • NVIDIA GB200 NVL72
      • Hopper versus Blackwell
      • HGX: High-Performance GPU Platforms
      • ARM Chips
      • ARM versus x86
      • RISC versus CISC
      • Introduction to RISC-V
    • Networking and Connectivity
      • Infiniband versus Ethernet
      • NVIDIA Quantum InfiniBand
      • PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express)
      • NVIDIA ConnectX InfiniBand adapters
      • NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express)
      • NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe-oF)
      • NVIDIA Spectrum-X
      • NVIDIA GPUDirect
      • Evaluating Modern GPU Interconnect
      • Scalable Hierarchical Aggregation and Reduction Protocol (SHARP)
      • Next-generation networking in AI environments
      • NVIDIA Collective Communications Library (NCCL)
    • Data and Memory
      • NVIDIA BlueField Data Processing Units (DPUs)
      • Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)
      • High Bandwidth Memory (HBM3)
      • Flash Memory
      • Model Requirements
      • Calculating GPU memory for serving LLMs
      • Transformer training costs
      • GPU Performance Optimisation
    • Libraries and Complements
      • NVIDIA Base Command
      • NVIDIA AI Enterprise
      • CUDA - NVIDIA GTC 2024 presentation
      • RAPIDs
      • RAFT
    • Vast Data Platform
      • Vast Datastore
      • Vast Database
      • Vast Data Engine
      • DASE (Disaggregated and Shared Everything)
      • Dremio and VAST Data
    • Storage
      • WEKA: A High-Performance Storage Solution for AI Workloads
      • Introduction to NVIDIA GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
        • GDS cuFile API
      • NVIDIA Magnum IO GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
      • Vectors in Memory
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Continuum - Accelerated Artificial Intelligence

  • Continuum Website
  • Axolotl Platform

Copyright Continuum Labs - 2023

On this page
  • The Current Landscape and Its Challenges
  • DSPy: A Shift in AI Pipeline Design
  • The Promise of DSPy
  • The DSPy programming model
  • THER DSPy compiler
  • Evaluation
  • Case Study
  • Summary: DSPy Framework and Evaluation
  • Key Components:
  • Core Benefits:
  • Evaluation:
  • Implications:

Was this helpful?

  1. KNOWLEDGE
  2. Retrieval Augmented Generation

DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls

PreviousDSPy: LM Assertions: Enhancing Language Model Pipelines with Computational ConstraintsNextDSPy: In-Context Learning for Extreme Multi-Label Classification

Last updated 10 months ago

Was this helpful?

This October 2023 paper introduces a programming model and framework called DSPy, designed for developing and optimizing language model (LM) pipelines, addresses critical challenges faced by AI researchers and developers.

The Current Landscape and Its Challenges

As language models have grown in complexity and capability, so too have the methods for harnessing their power. However, the current approach to building LM pipelines often relies on hard-coded "prompt templates." These templates, typically crafted through painstaking trial and error, present several limitations:

  1. Lack of scalability

  2. Brittleness across different tasks or models

  3. Heavy reliance on expert knowledge and manual fine-tuning

DSPy: A Shift in AI Pipeline Design

DSPy introduces a more systematic and programmatic approach to designing AI pipelines. At its core, DSPy reimagines LM pipelines as text transformation graphs with declarative modules. This conceptualization brings several key innovations:

  1. Modular Design: DSPy modules are parameterized, learnable components that can apply various techniques including prompting, finetuning, augmentation, and reasoning.

  2. Automated Optimization: The DSPy compiler optimizes pipelines by generating effective LM invocation strategies and prompts, reducing the need for manual prompt engineering.

  3. Flexible Learning Strategies: Teleprompters in DSPy determine how modules learn from data, allowing for adaptable optimization strategies.

The Promise of DSPy

DSPy's approach offers several compelling benefits:

  • More flexible and modular pipeline design

  • Reduced reliance on expert-crafted prompts

  • Enablement of optimization for complex, multi-stage NLP systems

  • Effective performance with smaller, more efficient LMs

Through case studies on math word problems and multi-hop question answering, DSPy has demonstrated significant performance improvements over standard few-shot prompting and expert-created demonstrations.

Notably, it has shown competitive results using smaller, open-source LMs compared to larger, proprietary models.

The DSPy programming model

This section of the paper delves deeper into the core components of the DSPy programming model. Here's a detailed analysis and summary of the key concepts:

Natural Language Signatures

DSPy introduces "signatures" as a way to abstract the input/output behavior of language model tasks. Instead of using free-form string prompts, signatures provide a structured way to declare what a text transformation should do.

Key points:

  • Signatures are tuples of input and output fields, with optional instructions.

  • They use natural language typing, inferring roles based on field names (e.g., "question" vs "answer").

  • Can be expressed in shorthand notation, e.g., "question -> answer".

  • Offer benefits over traditional prompts: can be compiled into self-improving, pipeline-adaptive prompts or fine-tunes.

Example:

qa = dspy.Predict("question -> answer")
result = qa(question="Where is Guaraní spoken?")
# Output: Prediction(answer='Guaraní is spoken mainly in South America.')

Parameterized and Templated Modules

Modules in DSPy are the building blocks that implement signatures. They abstract various prompting techniques into reusable, parameterized components.

Key points:

  • The core module is Predict, which handles basic signature implementation.

  • Other built-in modules like ChainOfThought, ProgramOfThought, etc., implement more complex prompting techniques.

  • Modules are parameterized, allowing for optimization of LM selection, prompt instructions, and demonstrations.

Example of a custom module (ChainOfThought):

class ChainOfThought(dspy.Module):
    def __init__(self, signature):
        rationale_field = dspy.OutputField(prefix="Reasoning: Let's think step by step.")
        signature = dspy.Signature(signature).prepend_output_field(rationale_field)
        self.predict = dspy.Predict(signature)
    
    def forward(self, **kwargs):
        return self.predict(**kwargs)

Programs

DSPy allows for the composition of modules into complex pipelines using a define-by-run interface.

Example of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system:

class RAG(dspy.Module):
    def __init__(self, num_passages=3):
        self.retrieve = dspy.Retrieve(k=num_passages)
        self.generate_answer = dspy.ChainOfThought("context, question -> answer")
    
    def forward(self, question):
        context = self.retrieve(question).passages
        return self.generate_answer(context=context, question=question)

Teleprompters

Teleprompters are optimizers in DSPy that tune the parameters of DSPy programs to maximize specified metrics.

Key points:

  • Take a program, training set, and metric as inputs.

  • Can work with small, potentially incomplete training sets.

  • Support various optimization strategies.

Example of using a teleprompter:

qa_trainset = [dspy.Example(question="What is the capital of France?", answer="Paris")]
teleprompter = dspy.BootstrapFewShot(metric=dspy.evaluate.answer_exact_match)
compiled_rag = teleprompter.compile(RAG(), trainset=qa_trainset)

Metrics and Customization

DSPy allows for custom metrics to guide the optimization process.

Example of a custom metric:

def answer_and_context_match(example, pred, trace=None):
    answer_match = dspy.evaluate.answer_exact_match(example, pred)
    context_match = any((pred.answer.lower() in c) for c in pred.context)
    return answer_match and context_match

Advanced Composition

Teleprompters can be composed, allowing for complex optimization strategies. For instance, using a large language model to supervise the training of a smaller, more efficient model.

Example:

finetuning_teleprompter = BootstrapFinetune(metric=dspy.evaluate.answer_passage_match)
compiled_rag_via_finetune = finetuning_teleprompter.compile(RAG(), teacher=compiled_rag, trainset=unlabeled_questions, target='google/flan-t5-large')

THER DSPy compiler

The DSPy compiler is a component of the framework responsible for automatically optimizing DSPy programs.

It works through a process called "compiling," which uses a teleprompter (an optimizer for DSPy programs) to improve the quality or efficiency of modules via prompting or fine-tuning. Let's break down the compiler's operation into its three main stages:

Stage 1: Candidate Generation

  • The compiler first recursively identifies all unique Predict modules (predictors) in a program, including those nested under other modules.

  • For each unique predictor, the teleprompter generates candidate values for the predictor's parameters. These parameters include: a) Instructions b) Field descriptions c) Demonstrations (example input-output pairs)

  • The paper focuses primarily on generating and selecting demonstrations, as these are found to be particularly effective in bootstrapping complex multi-stage systems.

Example: BootstrapFewShot Teleprompter (or Optimizer)

  • Simulates a teacher program (or a zero-shot version of the program being compiled) on training inputs.

  • May run multiple times with high temperature to increase diversity.

  • Tracks multi-stage traces transparently and in a thread-safe manner during execution.

  • Uses the program's metric to filter for multi-stage traces that help the pipeline pass the metric.

  • Keeps good examples as potential demonstrations and discards bad ones.

Key Insight: While language models can be unreliable, they can efficiently search the solution space for multi-stage designs. A well-decomposed program can typically find at least a few training examples where the LM passes the constraints enforced by the signatures and metrics.

Stage 2: Parameter Optimization

  • Each parameter now has a discrete set of candidates (demonstrations, instructions, etc.).

  • Various hyperparameter tuning algorithms can be applied for selection among candidates: a) Random search b) Tree-structured Parzen Estimators (as in HyperOpt and Optuna)

  • The paper mentions two implementations: a) BootstrapFewShotWithRandomSearch b) BootstrapFewShotWithOptuna

  • Another optimization approach is fine-tuning with BootstrapFinetune:

    • Uses demonstrations to update the LM's weights for each predictor.

    • Updates the LM parameter of each module to the new LM weights.

  • Typically, optimization aims to improve average quality using the metric with cross-validation over the training set or a validation set.

  • This process can work even without labels for intermediate stages, depending on the nature of the metric.

Stage 3: Higher-Order Program Optimization

  • This stage involves modifying the control flow of the program itself.

  • One simple form is ensembles:

    • Bootstraps multiple copies of the same program.

    • Replaces the original program with a new one that runs all copies in parallel.

    • Reduces their predictions into one with a custom function (e.g., majority voting).

  • Future potential:

    • Accommodate techniques for more dynamic (test-time) bootstrapping.

    • Implement automatic backtracking-like logic.

The DSPy compiler's approach is powerful because it can optimize complex, multi-stage language model pipelines without requiring extensive manual tuning or large amounts of labeled data.

By generating and selecting effective demonstrations, optimizing parameters, and even modifying program structure, the compiler can significantly improve the performance and efficiency of DSPy programs.

This automated optimization process allows developers to focus on high-level task definitions and pipeline structures, while the compiler handles the intricate details of making the system work effectively with various language models and tasks.

Evaluation

In the evaluation section, the researchers aimed to test three main hypotheses about DSPy:

  1. That DSPy can replace hand-crafted prompts with well-defined modules without losing quality.

  2. That DSPy's approach makes it better at adapting to different language models and can outperform expert-written prompts.

  3. That DSPy's modularity allows for exploring complex pipelines that can meet specific performance needs.

To test these ideas, they focused on math word problems using a dataset called GSM8K. They created three different programs using DSPy:

  1. A simple one-step program (vanilla)

  2. A two-step program that uses chain-of-thought reasoning (CoT)

  3. A more complex program that generates multiple reasoning attempts and compares them (reflection)

They then tested these programs in different ways:

  • Without any optimization (zero-shot)

  • With a simple few-shot learning approach

  • With more advanced optimization techniques (bootstrap and ensemble)

They tried these approaches with two different language models: GPT-3.5 and Llama2-13b-chat.

The results showed that:

  • The simple vanilla program struggled without optimization but improved significantly with DSPy's optimization techniques.

  • The CoT program performed well, especially when optimized, and could match or beat expert-written prompts.

  • The reflection program, despite being only slightly more complex, performed the best overall.

In general, using DSPy's optimization methods (bootstrap and ensemble) led to big improvements for all programs and both language models.

The researchers found that by using DSPy's modules and optimization techniques, they could improve the accuracy of these language models on math problems from as low as 4-20% to as high as 49-88%.

They also compared their results to other published studies and found that their approach using DSPy could achieve competitive or better results, even when using smaller language models or less human-provided information.

Overall, the evaluation showed that DSPy could effectively replace hand-crafted prompts, adapt well to different language models, and allow for the creation of powerful, flexible AI pipelines without needing extensive manual tuning.

Case Study

This case study focuses on evaluating DSPy's performance on complex question answering using the HotPotQA dataset. Here's a breakdown of the key points:

Task and Dataset

  • Multi-hop question answering using HotPotQA

  • Open-domain "fullwiki" setting

  • Used ColBERTv2 retriever for searching Wikipedia abstracts

Programs Tested: a) Vanilla: Simple question-to-answer program b) RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation): Uses chain-of-thought reasoning c) ReAct: Multi-step agent for tool use d) BasicMultiHop: Custom program simulating information flow in more complex systems

Compilation Strategies

  • Similar to the GSM8K case study (few-shot, bootstrap, ensemble)

  • Added fine-tuning with T5-Large for the multihop program

Key Findings

  • Chain-of-thought and retrieval-augmented generation (CoT RAG) improved performance significantly over vanilla few-shot prompting.

  • ReAct and multihop programs performed better by generating queries for multiple "hops" of retrieval.

  • The simple multihop program performed best overall.

  • Bootstrap compilation was very effective at improving quality for both tested language models (GPT-3.5 and Llama2-13b-chat).

  • DSPy's compilation strategies often outperformed few-shot prompting and expert human reasoning.

  • Llama2-13b-chat became competitive with GPT-3.5 when using DSPy's compilation techniques.

Noteworthy Result

  • A fine-tuned T5-Large model (770M parameters) achieved 39.3% answer exact match and 46.0% passage accuracy using only 200 labeled inputs and 800 unlabeled questions.

  • This smaller, locally-available model could potentially offer significant cost savings compared to using proprietary models like GPT-3.5.

Comparisons to Other Studies

  • DSPy's results are competitive with or surpass those reported in recent papers using various prompting techniques and larger language models.

This case study demonstrates DSPy's effectiveness in handling complex, multi-step reasoning tasks.

The framework's ability to improve performance across different model sizes and types (from T5-Large to GPT-3.5) showcases its versatility. The success of the multihop program highlights how DSPy allows for the creation of more sophisticated AI pipelines without extensive manual prompt engineering.

The study also emphasizes DSPy's potential for democratizing AI development. By achieving competitive results with smaller, open-source models like Llama2-13b-chat and even T5-Large, DSPy opens up possibilities for researchers and developers who may not have access to the largest, most expensive language models.

Overall, this case study provides strong evidence for DSPy's ability to optimize language model performance on complex tasks, potentially reducing the reliance on manually crafted prompts and very large language models.

Summary: DSPy Framework and Evaluation

DSPy is a novel programming model and framework designed to streamline the development and optimization of language model (LM) pipelines. It addresses key challenges in current AI development practices, particularly the reliance on hand-crafted prompts.

Key Components:

  1. Natural Language Signatures: Abstract input/output behavior of LM tasks

  2. Parameterized Modules: Reusable components implementing various prompting techniques

  3. Programs: Compositions of modules to create complex AI workflows

  4. Teleprompters (Optimizers): Automatically tune parameters to maximize specified metrics

Core Benefits:

  • Replaces hand-crafted prompts with modular, optimizable components

  • Improves adaptability to different LMs

  • Enables exploration of complex pipelines without extensive manual tuning

Evaluation:

DSPy was tested on two main tasks:

  1. Math Word Problems (GSM8K dataset)

  2. Complex Question Answering (HotPotQA dataset)

Key Findings:

  • Significant performance improvements over standard few-shot prompting and expert-created demonstrations

  • Effective across different LM sizes (from T5-Large to GPT-3.5)

  • Competitive results using smaller, open-source LMs compared to larger, proprietary models

  • Successful optimization of complex, multi-step reasoning tasks

Implications:

  1. Potential to standardize "foundation model programming"

  2. Democratization of AI development by enabling high performance with smaller, more accessible models

  3. Reduction in reliance on manual prompt engineering and very large language models

DSPy represents a significant step towards more systematic, efficient, and accessible AI pipeline development, potentially transforming how researchers and developers work with language models.

DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into...arXiv.org
Logo
Page cover image