LogoLogo
Continuum WebsiteContinuum ApplicationsContinuum KnowledgeAxolotl Platform
Continuum Knowledge
Continuum Knowledge
  • Continuum
  • Data
    • Datasets
      • Pre Training Data
      • Types of Fine Tuning
      • Self Instruct Paper
      • Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslation
      • Systematic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models on Open Datasets
      • Instruction Tuning
      • Instruction Fine Tuning - Alpagasus
      • Less is More For Alignment
      • Enhanced Supervised Fine Tuning
      • Visualising Data using t-SNE
      • UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
      • Training and Evaluation Datasets
      • What is perplexity?
  • MODELS
    • Foundation Models
      • The leaderboard
      • Foundation Models
      • LLama 2 - Analysis
      • Analysis of Llama 3
      • Llama 3.1 series
      • Google Gemini 1.5
      • Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMs
      • Mixtral of Experts
      • Mixture-of-Agents (MoA)
      • Phi 1.5
        • Refining the Art of AI Training: A Deep Dive into Phi 1.5's Innovative Approach
      • Phi 2.0
      • Phi-3 Technical Report
  • Training
    • The Fine Tuning Process
      • Why fine tune?
        • Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?
        • Explanations in Fine Tuning
      • Tokenization
        • Tokenization Is More Than Compression
        • Tokenization - SentencePiece
        • Tokenization explore
        • Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial?
        • Getting the most out of your tokenizer for pre-training and domain adaptation
        • TokenMonster
      • Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning
        • P-Tuning
          • The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
        • Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation
        • Harnessing the Power of PEFT: A Smarter Approach to Fine-tuning Pre-trained Models
        • What is Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) - explained by the inventor
        • Low Rank Adaptation (Lora)
        • Practical Tips for Fine-tuning LMs Using LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
        • Bits and Bytes
        • The Magic behind Qlora
        • Practical Guide to LoRA: Tips and Tricks for Effective Model Adaptation
        • The quantization constant
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized Language Models
        • QLORA and Fine-Tuning of Quantized Language Models (LMs)
        • ReLoRA: High-Rank Training Through Low-Rank Updates
        • SLoRA: Federated Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models
        • GaLora: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projection
      • Hyperparameters
        • Batch Size
        • Padding Tokens
        • Mixed precision training
        • FP8 Formats for Deep Learning
        • Floating Point Numbers
        • Batch Size and Model loss
        • Batch Normalisation
        • Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Language Models
        • Sample Packing
        • Gradient accumulation
        • A process for choosing the learning rate
        • Learning Rate Scheduler
        • Checkpoints
        • A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformers
        • Sequence Length Warmup
        • Understanding Training vs. Evaluation Data Splits
        • Cross-entropy loss
        • Weight Decay
        • Optimiser
        • Caching
      • Training Processes
        • Extending the context window
        • PyTorch Fully Sharded Data Parallel (FSDP)
        • Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolation
        • YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models
        • Sliding Window Attention
        • LongRoPE
        • Reinforcement Learning
        • An introduction to reinforcement learning
        • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
        • Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
  • INFERENCE
    • Why is inference important?
      • Grouped Query Attention
      • Key Value Cache
      • Flash Attention
      • Flash Attention 2
      • StreamingLLM
      • Paged Attention and vLLM
      • TensorRT-LLM
      • Torchscript
      • NVIDIA L40S GPU
      • Triton Inference Server - Introduction
      • Triton Inference Server
      • FiDO: Fusion-in-Decoder optimised for stronger performance and faster inference
      • Is PUE a useful measure of data centre performance?
      • SLORA
  • KNOWLEDGE
    • Vector Databases
      • A Comprehensive Survey on Vector Databases
      • Vector database management systems: Fundamental concepts, use-cases, and current challenges
      • Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Models
      • Decoding Sentence-BERT
      • ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT
      • SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
      • Questions Are All You Need to Train a Dense Passage Retriever
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
      • Massive Text Embedding Benchmark
      • RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-ranking
      • LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders
      • Embedding and Fine-Tuning in Neural Language Models
      • Embedding Model Construction
      • Demystifying Embedding Spaces using Large Language Models
      • Fine-Tuning Llama for Multi-Stage Text Retrieval
      • Large Language Model Based Text Augmentation Enhanced Personality Detection Model
      • One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings
      • Vector Databases are not the only solution
      • Knowledge Graphs
        • Harnessing Knowledge Graphs to Elevate AI: A Technical Exploration
        • Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap
      • Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN)
      • High Dimensional Data
      • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
      • Vector Similarity Search - HNSW
      • FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search)
      • Unsupervised Dense Retrievers
    • Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
      • Fine-Tuning or Retrieval?
      • Revolutionising Information Retrieval: The Power of RAG in Language Models
      • A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation
      • REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training
      • Retrieve Anything To Augment Large Language Models
      • Generate Rather Than Retrieve: Large Language Models Are Strong Context Generators
      • Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • DSPy: LM Assertions: Enhancing Language Model Pipelines with Computational Constraints
      • DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls
      • DSPy: In-Context Learning for Extreme Multi-Label Classification
      • Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs
      • HYDE: Revolutionising Search with Hypothetical Document Embeddings
      • Enhancing Recommender Systems with Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs
      • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) versus fine tuning
      • RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG
      • Summarisation Methods and RAG
      • Lessons Learned on LLM RAG Solutions
      • Stanford: Retrieval Augmented Language Models
      • Overview of RAG Approaches with Vector Databases
      • Mastering Chunking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems
    • Semantic Routing
    • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
  • AGENTS
    • What is agency?
      • Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselves
      • Types of Agents
      • The risk of AI agency
      • Understanding Personality in Large Language Models: A New Frontier in AI Psychology
      • AI Agents - Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling
      • Personality and Brand
      • Agent Interaction via APIs
      • Bridging Minds and Machines: The Legacy of Newell, Shaw, and Simon
      • A Survey on Language Model based Autonomous Agents
      • Large Language Models as Agents
      • AI Reasoning: A Deep Dive into Chain-of-Thought Prompting
      • Enhancing AI Reasoning with Self-Taught Reasoner (STaR)
      • Exploring the Frontier of AI: The "Tree of Thoughts" Framework
      • Toolformer: Revolutionising Language Models with API Integration - An Analysis
      • TaskMatrix.AI: Bridging Foundational AI Models with Specialised Systems for Enhanced Task Completion
      • Unleashing the Power of LLMs in API Integration: The Rise of Gorilla
      • Andrew Ng's presentation on AI agents
      • Making AI accessible with Andrej Karpathy and Stephanie Zhan
  • Regulation and Ethics
    • Regulation and Ethics
      • Privacy
      • Detecting AI Generated content
      • Navigating the IP Maze in AI: The Convergence of Blockchain, Web 3.0, and LLMs
      • Adverse Reactions to generative AI
      • Navigating the Ethical Minefield: The Challenge of Security in Large Language Models
      • Navigating the Uncharted Waters: The Risks of Autonomous AI in Military Decision-Making
  • DISRUPTION
    • Data Architecture
      • What is a data pipeline?
      • What is Reverse ETL?
      • Unstructured Data and Generatve AI
      • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
      • Integrating generative AI with the Semantic Web
    • Search
      • BM25 - Search Engine Ranking Function
      • BERT as a reranking engine
      • BERT and Google
      • Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO)
      • Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs
      • FOLLOWIR: Evaluating and Teaching Information Retrieval Models to Follow Instructions
      • Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Federated Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Latent Space versus Embedding Space
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
    • Recommendation Engines
      • On Interpretation and Measurement of Soft Attributes for Recommendation
      • A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation
      • Model driven recommendation systems
      • Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations
      • Foundation Models for Recommender Systems
      • Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Recommender Systems: An Extensive Review
      • AI driven recommendations - harming autonomy?
    • Logging
      • A Taxonomy of Anomalies in Log Data
      • Deeplog
      • LogBERT: Log Anomaly Detection via BERT
      • Experience Report: Deep Learning-based System Log Analysis for Anomaly Detection
      • Log-based Anomaly Detection with Deep Learning: How Far Are We?
      • Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Log Data: A Survey
      • LogGPT
      • Adaptive Semantic Gate Networks (ASGNet) for log-based anomaly diagnosis
  • Infrastructure
    • The modern data centre
      • Enhancing Data Centre Efficiency: Strategies to Improve PUE
      • TCO of NVIDIA GPUs and falling barriers to entry
      • Maximising GPU Utilisation with Kubernetes and NVIDIA GPU Operator
      • Data Centres
      • Liquid Cooling
    • Servers and Chips
      • The NVIDIA H100 GPU
      • NVIDIA H100 NVL
      • Lambda Hyperplane 8-H100
      • NVIDIA DGX Servers
      • NVIDIA DGX-2
      • NVIDIA DGX H-100 System
      • NVLink Switch
      • Tensor Cores
      • NVIDIA Grace Hopper Superchip
      • NVIDIA Grace CPU Superchip
      • NVIDIA GB200 NVL72
      • Hopper versus Blackwell
      • HGX: High-Performance GPU Platforms
      • ARM Chips
      • ARM versus x86
      • RISC versus CISC
      • Introduction to RISC-V
    • Networking and Connectivity
      • Infiniband versus Ethernet
      • NVIDIA Quantum InfiniBand
      • PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express)
      • NVIDIA ConnectX InfiniBand adapters
      • NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express)
      • NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe-oF)
      • NVIDIA Spectrum-X
      • NVIDIA GPUDirect
      • Evaluating Modern GPU Interconnect
      • Scalable Hierarchical Aggregation and Reduction Protocol (SHARP)
      • Next-generation networking in AI environments
      • NVIDIA Collective Communications Library (NCCL)
    • Data and Memory
      • NVIDIA BlueField Data Processing Units (DPUs)
      • Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)
      • High Bandwidth Memory (HBM3)
      • Flash Memory
      • Model Requirements
      • Calculating GPU memory for serving LLMs
      • Transformer training costs
      • GPU Performance Optimisation
    • Libraries and Complements
      • NVIDIA Base Command
      • NVIDIA AI Enterprise
      • CUDA - NVIDIA GTC 2024 presentation
      • RAPIDs
      • RAFT
    • Vast Data Platform
      • Vast Datastore
      • Vast Database
      • Vast Data Engine
      • DASE (Disaggregated and Shared Everything)
      • Dremio and VAST Data
    • Storage
      • WEKA: A High-Performance Storage Solution for AI Workloads
      • Introduction to NVIDIA GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
        • GDS cuFile API
      • NVIDIA Magnum IO GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
      • Vectors in Memory
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Continuum - Accelerated Artificial Intelligence

  • Continuum Website
  • Axolotl Platform

Copyright Continuum Labs - 2023

On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. Training
  2. The Fine Tuning Process
  3. Hyperparameters

Floating Point Numbers

Floating point numbers are a way for computers to approximately represent real numbers.

They allow a wide range of values to be stored, from very small to very large numbers, but with limited precision.

This is a tradeoff - floating point sacrifices exactness for speed, efficiency, and the ability to handle numbers across many orders of magnitude.

The basic idea is similar to scientific notation.

Just like how you can write very big or small numbers like 6.022 x 10^23 or 1.67 x 10^-27, floating point represents numbers as a mantissa multiplied by 2 raised to an exponent.

The mantissa holds the significant digits while the exponent indicates where the binary point should be placed relative to those digits.

The mantissa, also known as the significand, is the part of a floating-point number that holds the significant digits.

In the IEEE 754 standard, it's the fractional part that comes after the implied leading 1. So if we have a binary number like 1.01011, the mantissa bits would be 01011.

In the standard IEEE 754 32-bit floating point format:

  • The first bit is the sign bit (0 for positive, 1 for negative)

  • The next 8 bits are the exponent

  • The final 23 bits are the mantissa

The exponent is stored with a bias of 127. This allows it to represent both positive and negative powers of 2, from around -126 to 127. The mantissa bits are the fractional part after an implied leading 1 bit. So 1.xxxxxxxx where the x's are the stored 23 bits.

Some special values:

  • If the exponent is all 0s, and mantissa is 0, the number is 0

  • If the exponent is all 0s but mantissa is non-zero, it's a subnormal number very close to 0

  • If the exponent is all 1s and mantissa is 0, the value is infinity (positive or negative)

  • If the exponent is all 1s and mantissa is non-zero, the value is NaN (Not a Number)

Floating point allows large dynamic range but not infinite precision.

Adding more bits to the format increases precision, but there are always some numbers that can't be exactly represented, like how 1/3 stored in decimal is always an approximation.

So 0.1 + 0.2 might not exactly equal 0.3, and 1/10 + 2/10 often doesn't exactly equal 3/10.

The results are very close to the true value but not always exact, limited by the precision of the format. This can lead to surprising behaviours in calculations sometimes.

Overall, floating point is a clever way to balance dynamic range, precision, speed and efficiency in storing real numbers. The vast majority of the time it works great, but it's an approximation - floating point numbers aren't exactly the same as mathematical real numbers. Understanding the tradeoffs and limitations is important for using them effectively.

Here's a fun little Python script that demonstrates how a floating-point number is constructed from its parts:

def float_to_bits(f):
    # Get the raw bytes of the float
    b = struct.pack('>f', f)
    
    # Unpack the bytes into an integer
    i = struct.unpack('>I', b)[0]
    
    # Return the integer as a binary string
    return f"{i:032b}"

# Let's make a float!
sign = '0'          # Let's make a positive number
exponent = '10000001'  # This is 129 in binary, so the exponent is 129 - 127 = 2
mantissa = '01000000000000000000000'  # This is 0.25 in binary

# Concatenate the parts
binary = sign + exponent + mantissa

# Convert the binary string to an integer
i = int(binary, 2)

# Reinterpret the integer as a float
f = struct.unpack('>f', struct.pack('>I', i))[0]

print(f"Our float is: {f}")  # Prints "Our float is: 5.0"
print(f"Its binary representation is: {float_to_bits(f)}")

In this script, we manually construct a floating-point number by specifying the sign, exponent, and mantissa.

We then convert this to an actual float and print out its value and binary representation.

Now let's have some fun with floating-point precision!

print(0.1 + 0.2)  # Prints "0.30000000000000004"

a = 0.1
b = 0.2
c = 0.3

print(a + b == c)  # Prints "False"

This classic example demonstrates how floating-point numbers can sometimes yield surprising results due to their limited precision.

Here's another fun one:

i = 0
while i != 10:
    print(i)
    i += 0.1

# This loop runs forever!

You might expect this loop to print the numbers from 0 to 9 and then stop, but it actually runs forever!

This is because 0.1 cannot be exactly represented as a floating-point number, so each addition introduces a tiny error.

These errors accumulate, so the value of i never exactly equals 10.

Floating-point numbers are a fascinating topic, and there's a lot more to explore! I hope these examples have given you a fun introduction to how they work under the hood.

Floating Point Numbers in Deep Learning

In deep learning, floating-point numbers are ubiquitous.

They're used to represent weights, biases, inputs, outputs, and intermediate values in neural networks.

The most common floating-point formats in deep learning are 32-bit single-precision (FP32) and 16-bit half-precision (FP16).

When a floating-point number is stored in memory or in a register, the mantissa is stored in the least significant bits.

For example, in FP32, the mantissa is stored in bits 0-22, while the exponent is stored in bits 23-30, and the sign bit is stored in bit 31.

Here's a visual representation

bit:  31 30           23 22                                    0
      +-+---------------+-------------------------------------+
      |S| Exponent (8)  |            Mantissa (23)            |
      +-+---------------+-------------------------------------+
         
S = Sign bit

In practice, deep learning frameworks and hardware accelerators (like GPUs and TPUs) handle the storage and manipulation of these floating-point numbers behind the scenes.

As a deep learning practitioner, you typically work with higher-level abstractions like tensors, which are multi-dimensional arrays of floating-point numbers.

However, understanding how floating-point numbers are represented can be important for certain aspects of deep learning, such as:

Model quantization: This is a technique where the weights and activations of a neural network are converted from FP32 to a lower-precision format like FP16 or INT8 to reduce memory usage and computational cost. Knowing how the mantissa and exponent are stored can help you understand the tradeoffs involved.

Gradient scaling: During training, the gradients can sometimes become very small, leading to underflow in FP16. To combat this, techniques like gradient scaling are used, which involve multiplying the gradients by a scale factor to keep the mantissa within a representable range.

Mixed precision training: This is a technique where certain parts of the model (like the master weights) are kept in FP32, while other parts (like the activations and gradients) are computed in FP16.

Understanding how the mantissa and exponent are stored can help you decide which parts of the model can be safely computed in lower precision.

Here's a simple example in PyTorch that demonstrates the precision loss when converting from FP32 to FP16:

import torch

# Create a tensor in FP32
x = torch.tensor([1.0, 1.0000001, 1.0000002, 1.0000003, 1.0000004])
print(x)  # Prints "tensor([1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000])"

# Convert to FP16
x = x.half()
print(x)  # Prints "tensor([1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000], dtype=torch.float16)"

# Convert back to FP32
x = x.float()
print(x)  # Prints "tensor([1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000])"

As you can see, the small differences between 1.0 and 1.0000001, etc., are lost when converting to FP16 because there aren't enough mantissa bits to represent these tiny differences.

This is a common issue in deep learning when using lower-precision formats.

PreviousFP8 Formats for Deep LearningNextBatch Size and Model loss

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

Page cover image