LogoLogo
Continuum WebsiteContinuum ApplicationsContinuum KnowledgeAxolotl Platform
Continuum Knowledge
Continuum Knowledge
  • Continuum
  • Data
    • Datasets
      • Pre Training Data
      • Types of Fine Tuning
      • Self Instruct Paper
      • Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslation
      • Systematic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models on Open Datasets
      • Instruction Tuning
      • Instruction Fine Tuning - Alpagasus
      • Less is More For Alignment
      • Enhanced Supervised Fine Tuning
      • Visualising Data using t-SNE
      • UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
      • Training and Evaluation Datasets
      • What is perplexity?
  • MODELS
    • Foundation Models
      • The leaderboard
      • Foundation Models
      • LLama 2 - Analysis
      • Analysis of Llama 3
      • Llama 3.1 series
      • Google Gemini 1.5
      • Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMs
      • Mixtral of Experts
      • Mixture-of-Agents (MoA)
      • Phi 1.5
        • Refining the Art of AI Training: A Deep Dive into Phi 1.5's Innovative Approach
      • Phi 2.0
      • Phi-3 Technical Report
  • Training
    • The Fine Tuning Process
      • Why fine tune?
        • Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?
        • Explanations in Fine Tuning
      • Tokenization
        • Tokenization Is More Than Compression
        • Tokenization - SentencePiece
        • Tokenization explore
        • Tokenizer Choice For LLM Training: Negligible or Crucial?
        • Getting the most out of your tokenizer for pre-training and domain adaptation
        • TokenMonster
      • Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning
        • P-Tuning
          • The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
        • Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation
        • Harnessing the Power of PEFT: A Smarter Approach to Fine-tuning Pre-trained Models
        • What is Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) - explained by the inventor
        • Low Rank Adaptation (Lora)
        • Practical Tips for Fine-tuning LMs Using LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
        • Bits and Bytes
        • The Magic behind Qlora
        • Practical Guide to LoRA: Tips and Tricks for Effective Model Adaptation
        • The quantization constant
        • QLORA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized Language Models
        • QLORA and Fine-Tuning of Quantized Language Models (LMs)
        • ReLoRA: High-Rank Training Through Low-Rank Updates
        • SLoRA: Federated Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models
        • GaLora: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projection
      • Hyperparameters
        • Batch Size
        • Padding Tokens
        • Mixed precision training
        • FP8 Formats for Deep Learning
        • Floating Point Numbers
        • Batch Size and Model loss
        • Batch Normalisation
        • Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Language Models
        • Sample Packing
        • Gradient accumulation
        • A process for choosing the learning rate
        • Learning Rate Scheduler
        • Checkpoints
        • A Survey on Efficient Training of Transformers
        • Sequence Length Warmup
        • Understanding Training vs. Evaluation Data Splits
        • Cross-entropy loss
        • Weight Decay
        • Optimiser
        • Caching
      • Training Processes
        • Extending the context window
        • PyTorch Fully Sharded Data Parallel (FSDP)
        • Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolation
        • YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models
        • Sliding Window Attention
        • LongRoPE
        • Reinforcement Learning
        • An introduction to reinforcement learning
        • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
        • Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
  • INFERENCE
    • Why is inference important?
      • Grouped Query Attention
      • Key Value Cache
      • Flash Attention
      • Flash Attention 2
      • StreamingLLM
      • Paged Attention and vLLM
      • TensorRT-LLM
      • Torchscript
      • NVIDIA L40S GPU
      • Triton Inference Server - Introduction
      • Triton Inference Server
      • FiDO: Fusion-in-Decoder optimised for stronger performance and faster inference
      • Is PUE a useful measure of data centre performance?
      • SLORA
  • KNOWLEDGE
    • Vector Databases
      • A Comprehensive Survey on Vector Databases
      • Vector database management systems: Fundamental concepts, use-cases, and current challenges
      • Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Models
      • Decoding Sentence-BERT
      • ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERT
      • SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
      • Questions Are All You Need to Train a Dense Passage Retriever
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
      • Massive Text Embedding Benchmark
      • RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-ranking
      • LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders
      • Embedding and Fine-Tuning in Neural Language Models
      • Embedding Model Construction
      • Demystifying Embedding Spaces using Large Language Models
      • Fine-Tuning Llama for Multi-Stage Text Retrieval
      • Large Language Model Based Text Augmentation Enhanced Personality Detection Model
      • One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings
      • Vector Databases are not the only solution
      • Knowledge Graphs
        • Harnessing Knowledge Graphs to Elevate AI: A Technical Exploration
        • Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap
      • Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN)
      • High Dimensional Data
      • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
      • Vector Similarity Search - HNSW
      • FAISS (Facebook AI Similarity Search)
      • Unsupervised Dense Retrievers
    • Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
      • Fine-Tuning or Retrieval?
      • Revolutionising Information Retrieval: The Power of RAG in Language Models
      • A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation
      • REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training
      • Retrieve Anything To Augment Large Language Models
      • Generate Rather Than Retrieve: Large Language Models Are Strong Context Generators
      • Active Retrieval Augmented Generation
      • DSPy: LM Assertions: Enhancing Language Model Pipelines with Computational Constraints
      • DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls
      • DSPy: In-Context Learning for Extreme Multi-Label Classification
      • Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs
      • HYDE: Revolutionising Search with Hypothetical Document Embeddings
      • Enhancing Recommender Systems with Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs
      • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) versus fine tuning
      • RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAG
      • Summarisation Methods and RAG
      • Lessons Learned on LLM RAG Solutions
      • Stanford: Retrieval Augmented Language Models
      • Overview of RAG Approaches with Vector Databases
      • Mastering Chunking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems
    • Semantic Routing
    • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
  • AGENTS
    • What is agency?
      • Rephrase and Respond: Let Large Language Models Ask Better Questions for Themselves
      • Types of Agents
      • The risk of AI agency
      • Understanding Personality in Large Language Models: A New Frontier in AI Psychology
      • AI Agents - Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling
      • Personality and Brand
      • Agent Interaction via APIs
      • Bridging Minds and Machines: The Legacy of Newell, Shaw, and Simon
      • A Survey on Language Model based Autonomous Agents
      • Large Language Models as Agents
      • AI Reasoning: A Deep Dive into Chain-of-Thought Prompting
      • Enhancing AI Reasoning with Self-Taught Reasoner (STaR)
      • Exploring the Frontier of AI: The "Tree of Thoughts" Framework
      • Toolformer: Revolutionising Language Models with API Integration - An Analysis
      • TaskMatrix.AI: Bridging Foundational AI Models with Specialised Systems for Enhanced Task Completion
      • Unleashing the Power of LLMs in API Integration: The Rise of Gorilla
      • Andrew Ng's presentation on AI agents
      • Making AI accessible with Andrej Karpathy and Stephanie Zhan
  • Regulation and Ethics
    • Regulation and Ethics
      • Privacy
      • Detecting AI Generated content
      • Navigating the IP Maze in AI: The Convergence of Blockchain, Web 3.0, and LLMs
      • Adverse Reactions to generative AI
      • Navigating the Ethical Minefield: The Challenge of Security in Large Language Models
      • Navigating the Uncharted Waters: The Risks of Autonomous AI in Military Decision-Making
  • DISRUPTION
    • Data Architecture
      • What is a data pipeline?
      • What is Reverse ETL?
      • Unstructured Data and Generatve AI
      • Resource Description Framework (RDF)
      • Integrating generative AI with the Semantic Web
    • Search
      • BM25 - Search Engine Ranking Function
      • BERT as a reranking engine
      • BERT and Google
      • Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO)
      • Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs
      • FOLLOWIR: Evaluating and Teaching Information Retrieval Models to Follow Instructions
      • Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Federated Neural Collaborative Filtering
      • Latent Space versus Embedding Space
      • Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models
    • Recommendation Engines
      • On Interpretation and Measurement of Soft Attributes for Recommendation
      • A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation
      • Model driven recommendation systems
      • Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations
      • Foundation Models for Recommender Systems
      • Exploring the Impact of Large Language Models on Recommender Systems: An Extensive Review
      • AI driven recommendations - harming autonomy?
    • Logging
      • A Taxonomy of Anomalies in Log Data
      • Deeplog
      • LogBERT: Log Anomaly Detection via BERT
      • Experience Report: Deep Learning-based System Log Analysis for Anomaly Detection
      • Log-based Anomaly Detection with Deep Learning: How Far Are We?
      • Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection in Log Data: A Survey
      • LogGPT
      • Adaptive Semantic Gate Networks (ASGNet) for log-based anomaly diagnosis
  • Infrastructure
    • The modern data centre
      • Enhancing Data Centre Efficiency: Strategies to Improve PUE
      • TCO of NVIDIA GPUs and falling barriers to entry
      • Maximising GPU Utilisation with Kubernetes and NVIDIA GPU Operator
      • Data Centres
      • Liquid Cooling
    • Servers and Chips
      • The NVIDIA H100 GPU
      • NVIDIA H100 NVL
      • Lambda Hyperplane 8-H100
      • NVIDIA DGX Servers
      • NVIDIA DGX-2
      • NVIDIA DGX H-100 System
      • NVLink Switch
      • Tensor Cores
      • NVIDIA Grace Hopper Superchip
      • NVIDIA Grace CPU Superchip
      • NVIDIA GB200 NVL72
      • Hopper versus Blackwell
      • HGX: High-Performance GPU Platforms
      • ARM Chips
      • ARM versus x86
      • RISC versus CISC
      • Introduction to RISC-V
    • Networking and Connectivity
      • Infiniband versus Ethernet
      • NVIDIA Quantum InfiniBand
      • PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express)
      • NVIDIA ConnectX InfiniBand adapters
      • NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express)
      • NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe-oF)
      • NVIDIA Spectrum-X
      • NVIDIA GPUDirect
      • Evaluating Modern GPU Interconnect
      • Scalable Hierarchical Aggregation and Reduction Protocol (SHARP)
      • Next-generation networking in AI environments
      • NVIDIA Collective Communications Library (NCCL)
    • Data and Memory
      • NVIDIA BlueField Data Processing Units (DPUs)
      • Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)
      • High Bandwidth Memory (HBM3)
      • Flash Memory
      • Model Requirements
      • Calculating GPU memory for serving LLMs
      • Transformer training costs
      • GPU Performance Optimisation
    • Libraries and Complements
      • NVIDIA Base Command
      • NVIDIA AI Enterprise
      • CUDA - NVIDIA GTC 2024 presentation
      • RAPIDs
      • RAFT
    • Vast Data Platform
      • Vast Datastore
      • Vast Database
      • Vast Data Engine
      • DASE (Disaggregated and Shared Everything)
      • Dremio and VAST Data
    • Storage
      • WEKA: A High-Performance Storage Solution for AI Workloads
      • Introduction to NVIDIA GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
        • GDS cuFile API
      • NVIDIA Magnum IO GPUDirect Storage (GDS)
      • Vectors in Memory
Powered by GitBook
LogoLogo

Continuum - Accelerated Artificial Intelligence

  • Continuum Website
  • Axolotl Platform

Copyright Continuum Labs - 2023

On this page
  • Core Approach of LLM2Vec
  • Unsupervised and supervised learning
  • Evaluation and Contributions
  • How to interpret the scores
  • Significance and Novelty
  • Why It's Better Than Other Embedding Models
  • Implications

Was this helpful?

  1. KNOWLEDGE
  2. Vector Databases

LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders

PreviousRocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingNextEmbedding and Fine-Tuning in Neural Language Models

Last updated 7 months ago

Was this helpful?

This April 2024 paper explores how to effectively transform decoder-only Large Language Models (LLMs) into powerful text encoders for generating rich, contextualised text embeddings.

This transformation is done through a process called LLM2Vec.

LLM2Vec provides an effective method for transforming generic, decoder-only large language models into powerful text encoders that generate domain-specific embeddings.

This capability is important for industries that require nuanced understanding and processing of text specific to particular fields such as legal, medical, financial, or technical documents.

Core Approach of LLM2Vec

LLM2Vec modifies decoder-only LLMs using three main steps:

Enabling Bidirectional Attention: This step overcomes the inherent limitation of decoder-only models, which traditionally use causal attention that only allows each token to attend to previous tokens. By enabling bidirectional attention, each token can now attend to all other tokens in the sequence, improving the model's ability to generate more contextually rich embeddings.

How LLM2Vec Enables Bidirectional Attention in Decoder-Only Models

In decoder-only language models like GPT and LLaMA, the attention mechanism is typically causal, meaning that each token can only attend to itself and previous tokens in the sequence.

This unidirectional (left-to-right) attention is essential for tasks like text generation, where predicting the next word should not be influenced by future tokens.

However, for tasks that require a deep understanding of the entire sequence—such as generating high-quality text embeddings for semantic similarity, clustering, or classification—it's beneficial for tokens to attend to both past and future tokens. This is known as bidirectional attention.

LLM2Vec modifies the attention mechanism of decoder-only models to enable bidirectional attention, allowing each token to consider the full context of the sequence.

Here's how this is achieved:


Modifying the Attention Mechanism to Bidirectional

1. Understanding Self-Attention and Attention Masks

  • Self-Attention Mechanism:

    • In transformer models, the self-attention mechanism computes representations of each token by attending to other tokens in the sequence.

    • The attention scores determine how much influence each token has on others when computing these representations.

  • Attention Masks:

    • An attention mask is used to control which tokens can attend to which others.

    • In a matrix form, the attention mask has dimensions [sequence_length, sequence_length].

    • For causal attention, the mask is typically a lower-triangular matrix, which zeros out attention scores from future tokens.

2. Changing to Bidirectional Attention

  • Replacing the Causal Mask:

    • LLM2Vec replaces the causal attention mask with a fully open mask (an all-ones matrix or a zero mask, depending on implementation conventions).

    • This means that during the self-attention computation, every token can attend to every other token in the sequence, regardless of their position.

  • Implementation Steps:

    • Modify the Attention Mask:

      • In the model's code, adjust the function or module that generates the attention mask to produce an all-ones matrix instead of a lower-triangular matrix.

      • This effectively removes any restrictions on token-to-token attention.

  • Resulting Changes:

    • Each token's representation is now computed using information from all tokens in the sequence.

    • The model gains the ability to capture richer contextual information, as tokens can be influenced by both preceding and succeeding tokens.

3. Adapting the Model to the New Attention Mechanism

  • Why Adaptation Is Necessary:

    • The model was originally trained with causal attention; simply changing the mask may not yield optimal results.

    • The model needs to learn how to utilize the additional context provided by bidirectional attention.

  • Fine-Tuning with Masked Next Token Prediction (MNTP):

    • Objective:

      • Train the model to predict masked tokens using the full bidirectional context.

    • Process:

      • Randomly mask a fraction of tokens in input sequences.

      • Use the modified model (with bidirectional attention) to predict these masked tokens.

      • This helps the model adjust its internal representations to leverage both past and future tokens effectively.


Why This Modification Enhances Contextual Understanding

  • Rich Contextual Embeddings:

    • Bidirectional attention allows the model to capture dependencies and relationships that span the entire sequence.

    • This results in embeddings that are more representative of the overall meaning of the text.

  • Alignment with Encoder Models:

    • Encoder models like BERT use bidirectional attention and are known for their strong performance in understanding tasks.

    • By enabling bidirectional attention, decoder-only models can achieve similar capabilities in terms of contextual understanding.



Key Considerations

  • Compatibility with Model Architecture:

    • The modification is compatible with transformer architectures used in decoder-only models.

    • It requires access to the model's attention mechanism code to adjust the mask.

  • No Additional Parameters Introduced:

    • Changing the attention mask does not increase the number of model parameters.

    • The model's capacity remains the same; only the way it attends to input tokens changes.

  • Effectiveness Demonstrated:

    • Experiments have shown that this modification, combined with appropriate fine-tuning, significantly improves the model's performance on tasks requiring rich contextual embeddings.

Masked Next Token Prediction (MNTP): After enabling bidirectional attention, the next step involves adapting the model to effectively use this new capability through MNTP. This training technique combines aspects of masked language modeling and next token prediction, allowing the model to predict a token based on both previous and following context.

Unsupervised and supervised learning

Unsupervised Learning

  • Definition: In unsupervised learning, the model is trained on data without labels. The goal is often to identify patterns or structures within the data without any guidance on what outcomes should be predicted.

  • Application in LLM2Vec: Unsupervised training, such as using SimCSE, involves training the model to learn effective text representations by maximising the similarity between differently augmented views of the same data while minimising similarity with other contrasting examples in the dataset. This is done without specific target labels indicating the correct answer, focusing purely on the data's inherent characteristics.

Supervised Learning

  • Definition: Supervised learning involves training a model on a labeled dataset, where each training example includes an input paired with a correct label (or outcome). The model learns to map inputs to outputs based on this data.

  • Application in LLM2Vec: Supervised aspects in training could involve fine-tuning the model on specific tasks where the outcomes are known. For example, using labeled datasets where the text embeddings are specifically optimised to perform well on predefined tasks like text classification or entity recognition based on labeled examples.

Key Differences in Context

  • Nature of Data: Unsupervised training does not require labels and works by extracting patterns directly from the data. Supervised training relies on labeled data to learn the mapping from inputs to outputs.

  • Objective: The training objective in unsupervised learning typically involves learning good data representations or clustering, whereas in supervised learning, it is about predicting the label correctly.

  • Use Cases: Unsupervised learning is often used for exploring data, dimensionality reduction, or initial learning of data representation. Supervised learning is used when specific tasks need to be performed, like classification or regression.

  • Dependency on Data Labelling: Supervised learning's effectiveness heavily depends on the quantity and quality of the labelling in the training data, which can be costly and time-consuming. Unsupervised learning, however, can leverage unlabelled data, which is more abundantly available.

Evaluation and Contributions

  • The paper evaluates LLM2Vec on several NLP tasks, including word-level tasks like chunking, named-entity recognition, and part-of-speech tagging, and more complex sequence-level tasks using the Massive Text Embeddings Benchmark (MTEB).

  • LLM2Vec outperforms traditional encoder-only models in these tasks, setting new benchmarks for unsupervised performance on MTEB.

MTEB (Massive Text Embeddings Benchmark) tasks

The MTEB (Massive Text Embeddings Benchmark) tasks encompass a variety of classification, clustering, retrieval, and reranking tasks designed to evaluate text embedding models across diverse scenarios. Here's a breakdown of these tasks:

Classification Tasks

  • AmazonCounterfactualClassif: Determine if an Amazon review contains counterfactual statements (hypothetical or contrary-to-fact statements).

  • AmazonPolarityClassification: Classify Amazon reviews as having positive or negative sentiment.

  • AmazonReviewsClassification: Categorize Amazon reviews based on a rating scale.

  • Banking77Classification: Identify specific intents from online banking queries.

  • EmotionClassification: Classify Twitter messages into one of six emotions (anger, fear, joy, love, sadness, surprise).

  • ImdbClassification: Classify movie reviews from IMDB as positive or negative.

  • MassiveIntentClassification: Identify user intents from user utterances.

  • MassiveScenarioClassification: Determine scenarios from user utterances.

  • MTOPDomainClassification: Classify the domain of an intent in task-oriented conversations.

  • MTOPIntentClassification: Classify the intent of an utterance in task-oriented conversations.

  • ToxicConversationsClassif: Classify comments as toxic or non-toxic.

  • TweetSentimentClassification: Classify tweets' sentiment as positive, negative, or neutral.

Clustering Tasks

  • Arxiv/Biorxiv/Medrxiv Clustering: Identify primary and secondary categories of scientific papers based on titles and abstracts, applied to different repositories.

  • RedditClustering: Cluster Reddit posts based on topics or themes from titles or full posts.

  • StackExchangeClustering: Cluster StackExchange posts by topic or theme from titles or specific paragraphs.

  • TwentyNewsgroupsClustering: Cluster news articles into topic categories.

Retrieval Tasks

  • SprintDuplicateQuestions: Retrieve duplicate questions from a Sprint forum.

  • TwitterSemEval2015/TwitterURLCorpus: Retrieve tweets that are semantically similar.

  • AskUbuntuDupQuestions: Find duplicate questions on AskUbuntu forums.

  • MindSmallReranking/SciDocsRR/StackOverflowDupQuestions: Retrieve and rank documents or questions based on relevance to a given query.

  • ArguAna/ClimateFEVER/CQADupstackRetrieval/DBPedia/FEVER/FiQA2018/HotpotQA/MSMARCO/NFCorpus/NQ/QuoraRetrieval/SCIDOCS/SciFact/Touche2020/TRECCOVID: Various retrieval tasks where the goal is to find documents or answers that are relevant or directly answer a given query or claim.

Reranking Tasks

  • STS*: Semantic Textual Similarity tasks where the goal is to assess the degree of semantic similarity between pairs of text segments.

  • BUCC/Tatoeba: Tasks involved in finding parallel sentences across bilingual corpora.

  • SummEval: Evaluate the similarity of different text summaries.

These tasks are crucial for testing the capabilities of text embeddings to understand and process natural language in a way that mimics human understanding and categorisation.

They cover a broad spectrum from understanding user intents and emotional sentiments to retrieving and organizing knowledge across various domains. This comprehensive evaluation helps in improving and fine-tuning the models for practical applications in real-world scenarios.

The performance scores of the LLM2Vec-transformed models on the Massive Text Embeddings Benchmark (MTEB) provide insights into the capabilities and areas of strength of each model variant (S-LLaMA-1.3B, LLaMA-2-7B, and Mistral-7B).

Here are the top five key points based on the provided scores:

Overall Superiority of Mistral-7B

Across nearly all tasks, Mistral-7B consistently scores the highest, indicating its superior ability to generate and use text embeddings.

Strength in Classification and Retrieval Tasks

All three models demonstrate strong performance in various classification and retrieval tasks. Notably, Mistral-7B excels in classifying intent in contextual queries, which is critical for applications in digital customer service and chatbots.

High Performance in Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) Tasks

The models perform well in semantic similarity tasks, which are crucial for applications involving text comparison such as document deduplication, information retrieval, and summarisation.

Variability Across Different Tasks

There is noticeable variability in performance across different task types and datasets. This highlights the models' adaptability and potential need for domain-specific tuning to achieve optimal performance across various NLP tasks.

The absolute numbers in the scores provided for the MTEB tasks represent the model's performance metrics on each specific task.

How to interpret the scores

These scores are likely percentages representing the accuracy or a similar measure (such as F1-score, precision, recall, or a custom metric relevant to the task) that quantifies how well the model is performing against the benchmark's standards.

  1. Accuracy: This is a straightforward measurement where the score indicates the percentage of instances that the model predicted correctly out of the total number of instances evaluated.

  2. F1-Score: This is a harmonic mean of precision and recall and is often used in cases where the balance between precision and recall is critical, especially in datasets with uneven class distributions.

  3. Precision and Recall: Precision measures the accuracy of the positive predictions made by the model, while recall measures the ability of the model to find all the relevant cases (true positives).

Each task might use one of these or other specialised metrics depending on its requirements and the nature of the data.

For instance, classification tasks might use accuracy or F1-score, while retrieval tasks might measure precision at a certain cut-off rank or mean average precision.

The scores thus provide a quantitative measure of how well the model handles the task's challenges, like understanding context, distinguishing between nuanced categories, or retrieving the most relevant documents.

A higher score indicates better performance, showing that the model's embeddings effectively capture and utilize the linguistic and semantic nuances necessary for the task.

Significance and Novelty

  • Data and Parameter Efficiency: LLM2Vec is highlighted for its efficiency in terms of data use and minimal adaptation required, making it suitable for scenarios with limited computational resources.

  • Universal Text Encoding: The approach demonstrates that decoder-only LLMs can be converted into universal text encoders capable of handling a wide variety of NLP tasks effectively, challenging the traditional use of encoder-only or encoder-decoder models for generating text embeddings.

Why It's Better Than Other Embedding Models

Contextualised Representations

By converting decoder-only models to use bidirectional attention, LLM2Vec allows the model to consider full contextual information from both prior and subsequent tokens, leading to richer text embeddings.

Efficiency

LLM2Vec is described as highly efficient in terms of data and computational resources. It does not require extensive retraining or fine-tuning on large labeled datasets, which is often a significant limitation in deploying advanced NLP models.

Versatility and Adaptability

The transformed models can be adapted to a wide range of NLP tasks and domains with minimal additional investment, making it an economical choice for businesses.

State-of-the-Art Performance

LLM2Vec has demonstrated superior performance on benchmarks like the Massive Text Embeddings Benchmark (MTEB), outperforming existing encoder-only models, which emphasizes its capability to deliver high-quality embeddings that can significantly enhance various NLP applications.

Implications

This research suggests a paradigm shift in how we use LLMs for text embeddings, proposing a method that leverages the inherent strengths of decoder-only models (like training efficiency and robustness) and transforms them into versatile tools for embedding generation.

The simplicity and effectiveness of LLM2Vec potentially lower the barriers for adopting advanced NLP technologies in resource-constrained settings and broaden the scope of applications for LLMs in industry and academia.

Unsupervised Contrastive Learning: The final step involves using an unsupervised learning approach called , where the model learns to pull closer the embeddings of the same text with different dropout masks, and push apart embeddings of different texts. This method helps in refining the sequence-level embeddings without needing labeled data.

SimCSE
LogoLLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text EncodersarXiv.org
LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoders
The 3 steps of LLM2Vec. First, we enable bidirectional attention to overcome the restrictions of causal attention (Bi). Second, we adapt the model to use bidirectional attention by masked next token prediction training (MNTP). Third, we apply unsupervised contrastive learning with mean pooling to learn better sequence representations (SimCSE)
Top-10 models on the MTEB leader board as of April 2024.LLM2Vec achieves the 6th rank overall, and the top rank among models trained with only publicly available data
Unsupervised results of LLM2Vec transformed models on MTEB
Page cover image